[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210922213326.d4n57ml5vehmyaad@black.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 00:33:26 +0300
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
To: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Cc: "Zhang, Xiang1" <xiang1.zhang@...el.com>,
"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"Lutomirski, Andy" <luto@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Carlos O'Donell <carlos@...hat.com>,
Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
Taras Madan <tarasmadan@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/9] Linear Address Masking enabling
On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 10:03:32PM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> > 6. The kernel patches (this email thread) depend on the CET patches
> > (for the interface part only). And the CET patches is this, right?
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/?q=x86%2Fcet%2Fshstk
CET is two part patchset: shstk and ibt. Look for x86/cet/ibt.
At this point we plan to use CET interface, but it's not settled until it
actually lands upstream.
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists