[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAP-5=fVWGT0=0k0eG0c-6wEGod=49SVsumJRN2=SxmgOo5A4dw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 15:59:11 -0700
From: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
eranian@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] perf evlist: Remove group option.
On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 2:17 PM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 11:13:49AM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
>
> SNIP
>
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/python.c b/tools/perf/util/python.c
> > index 8feef3a05af7..9cd79513eebb 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/python.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/python.c
> > @@ -1109,14 +1109,6 @@ static PyObject *pyrf_evlist__open(struct pyrf_evlist *pevlist,
> > PyObject *args, PyObject *kwargs)
> > {
> > struct evlist *evlist = &pevlist->evlist;
> > - int group = 0;
> > - static char *kwlist[] = { "group", NULL };
> > -
> > - if (!PyArg_ParseTupleAndKeywords(args, kwargs, "|OOii", kwlist, &group))
> > - return NULL;
> > -
> > - if (group)
> > - evlist__set_leader(evlist);
> >
> > if (evlist__open(evlist) < 0) {
> > PyErr_SetFromErrno(PyExc_OSError);
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/record.c b/tools/perf/util/record.c
> > index bff669b615ee..9e694db7c7ee 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/record.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/record.c
> > @@ -99,13 +99,6 @@ void evlist__config(struct evlist *evlist, struct record_opts *opts, struct call
> > bool use_comm_exec;
> > bool sample_id = opts->sample_id;
> >
> > - /*
> > - * Set the evsel leader links before we configure attributes,
> > - * since some might depend on this info.
> > - */
> > - if (opts->group)
> > - evlist__set_leader(evlist);
> > -
>
> I don't mind erasing that, but just curious if you're going
> to add something which would clash with this? it does not
> look too complex for the code.. but still, let's remove it
> if it's in 'legacy mode' for this long ;-)
I've nothing conflicting but I came across old tutorials describing it
and I suspect usage of it is likely broken - in particular mixing
--group with -e {}.
Thanks,
Ian
> thanks,
> jirka
>
>
> > if (evlist->core.cpus->map[0] < 0)
> > opts->no_inherit = true;
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/record.h b/tools/perf/util/record.h
> > index 68f471d9a88b..d71dee9ce41c 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/record.h
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/record.h
> > @@ -13,7 +13,6 @@ struct option;
> >
> > struct record_opts {
> > struct target target;
> > - bool group;
> > bool inherit_stat;
> > bool no_buffering;
> > bool no_inherit;
> > --
> > 2.33.0.464.g1972c5931b-goog
> >
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists