[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210922230116.GA964074@nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 20:01:16 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
Cc: Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@...el.com>, hch@....de, jasowang@...hat.com,
joro@...tes.org, jean-philippe@...aro.org, kevin.tian@...el.com,
parav@...lanox.com, lkml@...ux.net, pbonzini@...hat.com,
lushenming@...wei.com, eric.auger@...hat.com, corbet@....net,
ashok.raj@...el.com, yi.l.liu@...ux.intel.com,
jun.j.tian@...el.com, hao.wu@...el.com, dave.jiang@...el.com,
jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com, kwankhede@...dia.com,
robin.murphy@....com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, dwmw2@...radead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com,
david@...son.dropbear.id.au, nicolinc@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [RFC 08/20] vfio/pci: Add VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMUFD
On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 03:01:01PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Sep 2021 14:29:39 -0300
> Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 02:38:36PM +0800, Liu Yi L wrote:
> > > +struct vfio_device_iommu_bind_data {
> > > + __u32 argsz;
> > > + __u32 flags;
> > > + __s32 iommu_fd;
> > > + __u64 dev_cookie;
> >
> > Missing explicit padding
> >
> > Always use __aligned_u64 in uapi headers, fix all the patches.
>
> We don't need padding or explicit alignment if we just swap the order
> of iommu_fd and dev_cookie. Thanks,
Yes, the padding should all be checked and minimized
But it is always good practice to always use __aligned_u64 in the uapi
headers just in case someone messes it up someday - it prevents small
mistakes from becoming an ABI mess.
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists