[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMpxmJWyepTvUQEAVDB2b=uocFTq49=yRiCXrxnwyLMe7LY_1Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 11:29:21 +0200
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
To: Prathamesh Shete <pshete@...dia.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
linux-gpio <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-tegra <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, smangipudi@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] arm64: tegra: GPIO Interrupt entries
On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 9:32 AM Prathamesh Shete <pshete@...dia.com> wrote:
>
> From: pshete <pshete@...dia.com>
>
> Tegra19x supports 8 entries for GPIO controller.
> This change adds the required interrupt entires for all GPIO controllers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Prathamesh Shete <pshete@...dia.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra194.dtsi | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra194.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra194.dtsi
> index b7d532841390..c681a79c44ec 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra194.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra194.dtsi
> @@ -34,11 +34,53 @@
> reg = <0x2200000 0x10000>,
> <0x2210000 0x10000>;
> interrupts = <GIC_SPI 288 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 289 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 290 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 291 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 292 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 293 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 294 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 295 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> <GIC_SPI 296 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 297 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 298 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 299 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 300 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 301 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 302 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 303 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> <GIC_SPI 304 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 305 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 306 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 307 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 308 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 309 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 310 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 311 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> <GIC_SPI 312 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 313 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 314 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 315 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 316 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 317 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 318 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 319 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> <GIC_SPI 320 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> - <GIC_SPI 328 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + <GIC_SPI 321 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 322 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 323 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 324 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 325 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 326 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 327 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 328 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 329 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 330 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 331 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 332 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 333 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 334 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 335 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> #interrupt-cells = <2>;
> interrupt-controller;
> #gpio-cells = <2>;
> @@ -1273,7 +1315,10 @@
> reg-names = "security", "gpio";
> reg = <0xc2f0000 0x1000>,
> <0xc2f1000 0x1000>;
> - interrupts = <GIC_SPI 56 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 56 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 57 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 58 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 59 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> gpio-controller;
> #gpio-cells = <2>;
> interrupt-controller;
> --
> 2.17.1
>
Prathamesh: what are the changes between the three versions of this
patch I have in my inbox? Please always include a brief list of
updates when resending.
Thierry: does this make sense to you?
Bart
Powered by blists - more mailing lists