[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9f89fce8-421a-2219-91d0-73147aca4689@amd.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 15:44:28 -0500
From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>
To: Marc Orr <marcorr@...gle.com>
Cc: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@...hat.com>,
x86 <x86@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Sergio Lopez <slp@...hat.com>, Peter Gonda <pgonda@...gle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Dov Murik <dovmurik@...ux.ibm.com>,
Tobin Feldman-Fitzthum <tobin@....com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, tony.luck@...el.com,
sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH Part2 v5 21/45] KVM: SVM: Make AVIC backing, VMSA and VMCB
memory allocation SNP safe
On 9/23/21 2:17 PM, Marc Orr wrote:
>>>> +
>>>> +struct page *snp_safe_alloc_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>>> +{
>>>> + unsigned long pfn;
>>>> + struct page *p;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_SEV_SNP))
>>>> + return alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT | __GFP_ZERO);
> Continuing my other comment, above: if we introduce a
> `snp_globally_enabled` var, we could use that here, rather than
> `cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_SEV_SNP)`.
Maybe I am missing something, what is wrong with
cpu_feature_enabled(...) check ? It's same as creating a global
variable. The feature enabled bit is not set if the said is not
enabled. See the patch #3 [1] in this series.
[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/YUN+L0dlFMbC3bd4@zn.tnic/T/#m2ac1242b33abfcd0d9fb22a89f4c103eacf67ea7
thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists