| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CACPK8XeeEeQb52ZHYaN49r_Vso-xUHamDyrA+bFvP4_ESQs9dA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 00:02:17 +0000
From: Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>
To: Chin-Ting Kuo <chin-ting_kuo@...eedtech.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
linux-aspeed <linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
OpenBMC Maillist <openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>,
BMC-SW <BMC-SW@...eedtech.com>,
Steven Lee <steven_lee@...eedtech.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] clk: aspeed: ast2600: Porting sdhci clock source
On Wed, 22 Sept 2021 at 10:31, Chin-Ting Kuo
<chin-ting_kuo@...eedtech.com> wrote:
>
> - There are two clock sources used to generate
> SD/SDIO clock, APLL clock and HCLK (200MHz).
> User can select which clock source should be used
> by configuring SCU310[8].
> - The SD/SDIO clock divider selection table SCU310[30:28]
> is different between AST2600-A1 and AST2600-A2/A3.
> For AST2600-A1, 200MHz SD/SDIO clock cannot be
> gotten by the dividers in SCU310[30:28] if APLL
> is not the multiple of 200MHz and HCLK is 200MHz.
> For AST2600-A2/A3, a new divider, "1", is added and
> 200MHz SD/SDIO clock can be obtained by adopting HCLK
> as clock source and setting SCU310[30:28] to 3b'111.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chin-Ting Kuo <chin-ting_kuo@...eedtech.com>
> ---
> drivers/clk/clk-ast2600.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-ast2600.c b/drivers/clk/clk-ast2600.c
> index bc3be5f3eae1..a6778c18274a 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk-ast2600.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-ast2600.c
> @@ -168,6 +168,30 @@ static const struct clk_div_table ast2600_div_table[] = {
> { 0 }
> };
>
> +static const struct clk_div_table ast2600_sd_div_a1_table[] = {
Let's put the revision next to the ast2600 like the other tables:
ast2600_a1_sd_div_table
> + { 0x0, 2 },
> + { 0x1, 4 },
> + { 0x2, 6 },
> + { 0x3, 8 },
> + { 0x4, 10 },
> + { 0x5, 12 },
> + { 0x6, 14 },
> + { 0x7, 16 },
> + { 0 }
> +};
> +
> +static const struct clk_div_table ast2600_sd_div_a2_table[] = {
For naming; can I propose we omit the revision for the A2/A3+ case? So
this one would be called:
ast2600_sd_div_table
> + { 0x0, 2 },
> + { 0x1, 4 },
> + { 0x2, 6 },
> + { 0x3, 8 },
> + { 0x4, 10 },
> + { 0x5, 12 },
> + { 0x6, 14 },
> + { 0x7, 1 },
> + { 0 }
> +};
> +
> /* For hpll/dpll/epll/mpll */
> static struct clk_hw *ast2600_calc_pll(const char *name, u32 val)
> {
> @@ -424,6 +448,11 @@ static const char *const emmc_extclk_parent_names[] = {
> "mpll",
> };
>
> +static const char *const sd_extclk_parent_names[] = {
> + "hclk",
> + "apll",
> +};
> +
> static const char * const vclk_parent_names[] = {
> "dpll",
> "d1pll",
> @@ -523,18 +552,42 @@ static int aspeed_g6_clk_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return PTR_ERR(hw);
> aspeed_g6_clk_data->hws[ASPEED_CLK_EMMC] = hw;
>
> - /* SD/SDIO clock divider and gate */
> - hw = clk_hw_register_gate(dev, "sd_extclk_gate", "hpll", 0,
> - scu_g6_base + ASPEED_G6_CLK_SELECTION4, 31, 0,
> - &aspeed_g6_clk_lock);
> + clk_hw_register_fixed_rate(NULL, "hclk", NULL, 0, 200000000);
> +
> + regmap_read(map, 0x310, &val);
Use the #defines for the register number.
> + hw = clk_hw_register_mux(dev, "sd_extclk_mux",
> + sd_extclk_parent_names,
> + ARRAY_SIZE(sd_extclk_parent_names), 0,
> + scu_g6_base + ASPEED_G6_CLK_SELECTION4, 8, 1,
> + 0, &aspeed_g6_clk_lock);
> if (IS_ERR(hw))
> return PTR_ERR(hw);
> - hw = clk_hw_register_divider_table(dev, "sd_extclk", "sd_extclk_gate",
> - 0, scu_g6_base + ASPEED_G6_CLK_SELECTION4, 28, 3, 0,
> - ast2600_div_table,
> - &aspeed_g6_clk_lock);
> +
> + hw = clk_hw_register_gate(dev, "sd_extclk_gate", "sd_extclk_mux",
> + 0, scu_g6_base + ASPEED_G6_CLK_SELECTION4,
> + 31, 0, &aspeed_g6_clk_lock);
> if (IS_ERR(hw))
> return PTR_ERR(hw);
> +
> + regmap_read(map, 0x14, &val);
> + /* AST2600-A2/A3 clock divisor is different from AST2600-A1 */
> + if (((val & GENMASK(23, 16)) >> 16) >= 2) {
I've got a little patch that I recommend you base your series on (feel
free to include it in your series when posting v2 to make it
self-contained):
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210922235449.213631-1-joel@jms.id.au/
With this one you can do:
const struct clk_div_table* table;
if (soc_rev >= 2)
table = ast2600_sd_div_table;
else
table = ast2600_a1_sd_div_table;
Then you don't need to duplicate the registration for each case:
hw = clk_hw_register_divider_table(dev, "sd_extclk",
"sd_extclk_gate",
0, scu_g6_base +
ASPEED_G6_CLK_SELECTION4, 28, 3, 0,
table,
&aspeed_g6_clk_lock);
if (IS_ERR(hw))
return PTR_ERR(hw);
> + /* AST2600-A2/A3 */
> + hw = clk_hw_register_divider_table(dev, "sd_extclk", "sd_extclk_gate",
> + 0, scu_g6_base + ASPEED_G6_CLK_SELECTION4, 28, 3, 0,
> + ast2600_sd_div_a2_table,
> + &aspeed_g6_clk_lock);
> + if (IS_ERR(hw))
> + return PTR_ERR(hw);
> + } else {
> + /* AST2600-A1 */
> + hw = clk_hw_register_divider_table(dev, "sd_extclk", "sd_extclk_gate",
> + 0, scu_g6_base + ASPEED_G6_CLK_SELECTION4, 28, 3, 0,
> + ast2600_sd_div_a1_table,
> + &aspeed_g6_clk_lock);
> + if (IS_ERR(hw))
> + return PTR_ERR(hw);
> + }
> aspeed_g6_clk_data->hws[ASPEED_CLK_SDIO] = hw;
>
> /* MAC1/2 RMII 50MHz RCLK */
> --
> 2.17.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists