[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210923004515.GD3053272@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 17:45:15 -0700
From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: Folio discussion recap
On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 11:18:52PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
...
> +/**
> + * page_slab - Converts from page to slab.
> + * @p: The page.
> + *
> + * This function cannot be called on a NULL pointer. It can be called
> + * on a non-slab page; the caller should check is_slab() to be sure
> + * that the slab really is a slab.
> + *
> + * Return: The slab which contains this page.
> + */
> +#define page_slab(p) (_Generic((p), \
> + const struct page *: (const struct slab *)_compound_head(p), \
> + struct page *: (struct slab *)_compound_head(p)))
> +
> +static inline bool is_slab(struct slab *slab)
> +{
> + return test_bit(PG_slab, &slab->flags);
> +}
> +
I'm sorry, I don't have a dog in this fight and conceptually I think folios are
a good idea...
But for this work, having a call which returns if a 'struct slab' really is a
'struct slab' seems odd and well, IMHO, wrong. Why can't page_slab() return
NULL if there is no slab containing that page?
Ira
Powered by blists - more mailing lists