[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ab4ea50f-9149-3468-ce2b-7cd421095b40@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 16:00:28 +0300
From: Péter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...ux.intel.com>
To: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....nxp.com>, broonie@...nel.org
Cc: alsa-devel@...a-project.org, kai.vehmanen@...ux.intel.com,
lgirdwood@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ranjani.sridharan@...ux.intel.com,
Guennadi Liakhovetski <guennadi.liakhovetski@...ux.intel.com>,
daniel.baluta@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/12] ASoC: SOF: Intel: hda: make sure DAI widget is
set up before IPC
On 23/09/2021 15:58, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
>
>>> +static struct sof_ipc_dai_config *hda_dai_update_config(struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *w,
>>> + int channel)
>>> {
>>> + struct snd_sof_widget *swidget = w->dobj.private;
>>> struct sof_ipc_dai_config *config;
>>> struct snd_sof_dai *sof_dai;
>>> - struct sof_ipc_reply reply;
>>> - int ret = 0;
>>>
>>> - list_for_each_entry(sof_dai, &hda_stream->sdev->dai_list, list) {
>>> - if (!sof_dai->cpu_dai_name)
>>> - continue;
>>> + if (!swidget) {
>>> + dev_err(swidget->scomp->dev, "error: No private data for widget %s\n", w->name);
>>
>> NULL pointer dereference, just return NULL without the print. The caller
>> is printing anyways.
>
> yes good catch, we need a v3 with the fixes suggested by Peter in
> https://github.com/thesofproject/linux/pull/3171/ applied.
Only the second patch in the PR is applicable for upstream, but it
should be squashed in for v3.
--
Péter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists