[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210923145802.50938-11-cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 15:57:59 +0100
From: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: sudeep.holla@....com, james.quinlan@...adcom.com,
Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
etienne.carriere@...aro.org, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
souvik.chakravarty@....com, peter.hilber@...nsynergy.com,
igor.skalkin@...nsynergy.com, cristian.marussi@....com
Subject: [PATCH v5 10/13] firmware: arm_scmi: Make smc transport use common completions
When a completion irq is available use it and delegate command completion
handling to the core SCMI completion mechanism.
If no completion irq is available revert to polling, using the core common
polling machinery.
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
---
v4 --> v5
- removed RFC tag
v3 --> v4
- renamed usage of .needs_polling to .no_completion_irq
---
drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/smc.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/smc.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/smc.c
index 4effecc3bb46..adaa40df3855 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/smc.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/smc.c
@@ -25,8 +25,6 @@
* @shmem: Transmit/Receive shared memory area
* @shmem_lock: Lock to protect access to Tx/Rx shared memory area
* @func_id: smc/hvc call function id
- * @irq: Optional; employed when platforms indicates msg completion by intr.
- * @tx_complete: Optional, employed only when irq is valid.
*/
struct scmi_smc {
@@ -34,15 +32,14 @@ struct scmi_smc {
struct scmi_shared_mem __iomem *shmem;
struct mutex shmem_lock;
u32 func_id;
- int irq;
- struct completion tx_complete;
};
static irqreturn_t smc_msg_done_isr(int irq, void *data)
{
struct scmi_smc *scmi_info = data;
- complete(&scmi_info->tx_complete);
+ scmi_rx_callback(scmi_info->cinfo,
+ shmem_read_header(scmi_info->shmem), NULL);
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
@@ -111,8 +108,8 @@ static int smc_chan_setup(struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo, struct device *dev,
dev_err(dev, "failed to setup SCMI smc irq\n");
return ret;
}
- init_completion(&scmi_info->tx_complete);
- scmi_info->irq = irq;
+ } else {
+ cinfo->no_completion_irq = true;
}
scmi_info->func_id = func_id;
@@ -142,26 +139,21 @@ static int smc_send_message(struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo,
struct scmi_smc *scmi_info = cinfo->transport_info;
struct arm_smccc_res res;
+ /*
+ * Channel lock will be released only once response has been
+ * surely fully retrieved, so after .mark_txdone()
+ */
mutex_lock(&scmi_info->shmem_lock);
-
shmem_tx_prepare(scmi_info->shmem, xfer);
- if (scmi_info->irq)
- reinit_completion(&scmi_info->tx_complete);
-
arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(scmi_info->func_id, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, &res);
- if (scmi_info->irq)
- wait_for_completion(&scmi_info->tx_complete);
-
- scmi_rx_callback(scmi_info->cinfo,
- shmem_read_header(scmi_info->shmem), NULL);
-
- mutex_unlock(&scmi_info->shmem_lock);
-
/* Only SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED is valid error code */
- if (res.a0)
+ if (res.a0) {
+ mutex_unlock(&scmi_info->shmem_lock);
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ }
+
return 0;
}
@@ -173,6 +165,13 @@ static void smc_fetch_response(struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo,
shmem_fetch_response(scmi_info->shmem, xfer);
}
+static void smc_mark_txdone(struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo, int ret)
+{
+ struct scmi_smc *scmi_info = cinfo->transport_info;
+
+ mutex_unlock(&scmi_info->shmem_lock);
+}
+
static bool
smc_poll_done(struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo, struct scmi_xfer *xfer)
{
@@ -186,6 +185,7 @@ static const struct scmi_transport_ops scmi_smc_ops = {
.chan_setup = smc_chan_setup,
.chan_free = smc_chan_free,
.send_message = smc_send_message,
+ .mark_txdone = smc_mark_txdone,
.fetch_response = smc_fetch_response,
.poll_done = smc_poll_done,
};
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists