lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YU4er4mzHfa4+7Jg@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 24 Sep 2021 15:53:35 -0300
From:   Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To:     James Clark <james.clark@....com>
Cc:     linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf tests: Fix flaky test 'Object code reading'

Em Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 04:22:38PM +0100, James Clark escreveu:
> This test occasionally fails on aarch64 when a sample is taken in
> free@plt and it fails with "Bytes read differ from those read by
> objdump". This is because that symbol is near a section boundary in the
> elf file. Despite the -z option to always output zeros, objdump uses
> bfd_map_over_sections() to iterate through the elf file so it doesn't
> see outside of the sections where these zeros are and can't print them.
> 
> For example this boundary proceeds free@plt in libc with a gap of 48
> bytes between .plt and .text:
> 
>   objdump -d -z --start-address=0x23cc8 --stop-address=0x23d08 libc-2.30.so
> 
>   libc-2.30.so:     file format elf64-littleaarch64
> 
>   Disassembly of section .plt:
> 
>   0000000000023cc8 <*ABS*+0x7fd00@...+0x8>:
>      23cc8:	91018210 	add	x16, x16, #0x60
>      23ccc:	d61f0220 	br	x17
> 
>   Disassembly of section .text:
> 
>   0000000000023d00 <abort@@GLIBC_2.17-0x98>:
>      23d00:	a9bf7bfd 	stp	x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!
>      23d04:	910003fd 	mov	x29, sp
> 
> Taking a sample in free@plt is very rare because it is so small, but the
> test can be forced to fail almost every time on any platform by linking
> the test with a shared library that has a single empty function and
> calling it in a loop.
> 
> The fix is to zero the buffers so that when there is a jump in the
> addresses output by objdump, zeros are already filled in between.

Thanks, applied.

- Arnaldo

 
> Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@....com>
> ---
>  tools/perf/tests/code-reading.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/code-reading.c b/tools/perf/tests/code-reading.c
> index 9866cddebf23..9b4a765e4b73 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/code-reading.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/code-reading.c
> @@ -229,8 +229,8 @@ static int read_object_code(u64 addr, size_t len, u8 cpumode,
>  			    struct thread *thread, struct state *state)
>  {
>  	struct addr_location al;
> -	unsigned char buf1[BUFSZ];
> -	unsigned char buf2[BUFSZ];
> +	unsigned char buf1[BUFSZ] = {0};
> +	unsigned char buf2[BUFSZ] = {0};
>  	size_t ret_len;
>  	u64 objdump_addr;
>  	const char *objdump_name;
> -- 
> 2.28.0

-- 

- Arnaldo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ