[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ea23f319-49df-5905-758e-478baf44bdc9@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2021 20:39:18 +0100
From: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
"Namhyung Kim" <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Jin Yao <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>,
"Paul A . Clarke" <pc@...ibm.com>,
<linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] perf test: Workload test of metric and
metricgroups
On 24/09/2021 20:09, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 11:42:39AM -0700, Ian Rogers escreveu:
>> Test every metric and metricgroup with 'true' as a workload. For
>> metrics, check that we see the metric printed or get unsupported. If the
>> 'true' workload executes too quickly retry with 'perf bench internals
>> synthesize'.
>>
>> v3. Fix test condition (thanks to Paul A. Clarke<pc@...ibm.com>). Add a
>> fallback case of a larger workload so that we don't ignore "<not
>> counted>".
>> v2. Switched the workload to something faster.
> Hi John, does your Reviewed-by stands for v3 too?
>
> - Arnaldo
>
Yeah,
Reviewed-by: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists