[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YVNlDGP8NCWocNtY@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 15:55:08 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Jin Yao <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>,
"Paul A . Clarke" <pc@...ibm.com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
eranian@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] perf test: Workload test of metric and
metricgroups
Em Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 08:39:18PM +0100, John Garry escreveu:
> On 24/09/2021 20:09, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 11:42:39AM -0700, Ian Rogers escreveu:
> > > Test every metric and metricgroup with 'true' as a workload. For
> > > metrics, check that we see the metric printed or get unsupported. If the
> > > 'true' workload executes too quickly retry with 'perf bench internals
> > > synthesize'.
> > > v3. Fix test condition (thanks to Paul A. Clarke<pc@...ibm.com>). Add a
> > > fallback case of a larger workload so that we don't ignore "<not
> > > counted>".
> > > v2. Switched the workload to something faster.
> > Hi John, does your Reviewed-by stands for v3 too?
> Yeah,
> Reviewed-by: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
Thanks, applied.
- Arnaldo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists