linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] perf test: Workload test of metric and metricgroups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <158a1451-9d69-d67d-3fad-9e947112f9e6@huawei.com>
Date:   Wed, 12 Jan 2022 12:24:29 +0000
From:   John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
To:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
CC:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        "Namhyung Kim" <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Jin Yao <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>,
        "Paul A . Clarke" <pc@...ibm.com>,
        <linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] perf test: Workload test of metric and
 metricgroups

On 24/09/2021 20:09, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 11:42:39AM -0700, Ian Rogers escreveu:
>> Test every metric and metricgroup with 'true' as a workload. For
>> metrics, check that we see the metric printed or get unsupported. If the
>> 'true' workload executes too quickly retry with 'perf bench internals
>> synthesize'.
>>
>> v3. Fix test condition (thanks to Paul A. Clarke<pc@...ibm.com>). Add a
>>      fallback case of a larger workload so that we don't ignore "<not
>>      counted>".
>> v2. Switched the workload to something faster.

Hi Ian,

I just noticed that this test fails on my broadwell machine.

I am using acme perf/core @ 09dd3c22daaf

metricgroup Memory_Bw fails, and it seems because of the "true" argument 
to "perf stat" (or any argument, like sleep 1):

john@...alhost:~/kernel-dev9/tools/perf> sudo ./perf stat -M Memory_BW
^C
  Performance counter stats for 'system wide':

              2,184      arb/event=0x84,umask=0x1/ #     0.26 
DRAM_BW_Use
          2,954,938      arb/event=0x81,umask=0x1/ 

        736,368,852 ns   duration_time 

         58,202,980      l1d_pend_miss.pending_cycles #     2.34 MLP 
                  (80.11%)
        136,293,194      l1d_pend_miss.pending 
               (19.89%)
        736,368,852 ns   duration_time 

          1,065,656      longest_lat_cache.miss    #     0.09 
L3_Cache_Fill_BW         (39.71%)
        736,368,852 ns   duration_time 

          5,365,477      l2_lines_in.all           #     0.47 
L2_Cache_Fill_BW         (59.80%)
        736,368,852 ns   duration_time 

          3,557,362      l1d.replacement           #     0.31 
L1D_Cache_Fill_BW        (79.90%)
        736,368,852 ns   duration_time 


        0.736368852 seconds time elapsed


john@...alhost:~/kernel-dev9/tools/perf> sudo ./perf stat -M Memory_BW true
Error:
The sys_perf_event_open() syscall returned with 22 (Invalid argument) 
for event (arb/event=0x84,umask=0x1/).
/bin/dmesg | grep -i perf may provide additional information.

john@...alhost:~/kernel-dev9/tools/perf>

Anyone any idea on this before I start digging?

Thanks,
John