linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] printk: avoid -Wsometimes-uninitialized warning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 27 Sep 2021 20:32:12 +0200
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:     Chris Down <chris@...isdown.name>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>,
        Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk: avoid -Wsometimes-uninitialized warning

On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 6:21 PM Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 27 Sep 2021 14:19:18 +0100
> Chris Down <chris@...isdown.name> wrote:
>
> > Having IS_ENABLED and then an #ifdef seems to hurt code readability to me.
>
> I agree.
>
> Would this be a better solution?

Sounds good, I'll follow up with that version after the next round of randconfig
builds.

Thanks,

      Arnd