linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: s3c244x: add fallthrough comments for switch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 27 Sep 2021 11:55:57 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: s3c244x: add fallthrough comments for switch

On 27/09/2021 11:51, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> 
> Apparently nobody has so far caught this warning, I hit it in randconfig
> build testing:
> 
> drivers/cpufreq/s3c2440-cpufreq.c: In function 's3c2440_cpufreq_setdivs':
> drivers/cpufreq/s3c2440-cpufreq.c:175:10: error: this statement may fall through [-Werror=implicit-fallthrough=]
>    camdiv |= S3C2440_CAMDIVN_HCLK3_HALF;
>           ^
> drivers/cpufreq/s3c2440-cpufreq.c:176:2: note: here
>   case 3:
>   ^~~~
> drivers/cpufreq/s3c2440-cpufreq.c:181:10: error: this statement may fall through [-Werror=implicit-fallthrough=]
>    camdiv |= S3C2440_CAMDIVN_HCLK4_HALF;
>           ^
> drivers/cpufreq/s3c2440-cpufreq.c:182:2: note: here
>   case 4:
>   ^~~~
> 
> Both look like the fallthrough is intentional, so add the new
> "fallthrough;" keyword.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/s3c2440-cpufreq.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

I think I saw it but back then implicit-fallthrough was not an error :)

LGTM:

Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>


Best regards,
Krzysztof