linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 2/4] mfd: arizona: Add missing entries SPI to device ID table

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 27 Sep 2021 10:27:54 +0000
From:   Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC:     Richard Fitzgerald <rf@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <patches@...nsource.cirrus.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/4] mfd: arizona: Add missing entries SPI to device
 ID table

On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 12:20:01PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 10:24:17AM +0100, Richard Fitzgerald wrote:
> > On 23/09/2021 20:46, Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> > > Currently autoloading for SPI devices does not use the DT ID table, it uses
> > > SPI modalises. Supporting OF modalises is going to be difficult if not
> > > impractical, an attempt was made but has been reverted, so ensure that
> > > module autoloading works for this driver by adding SPI IDs for parts that
> > > only have a compatible listed.
> 
> > >   static const struct spi_device_id arizona_spi_ids[] = {
> > > +	{ "wm1814", WM1814 },
> > >   	{ "wm5102", WM5102 },
> > >   	{ "wm5110", WM5110 },
> > >   	{ "wm8280", WM8280 },
> > > +	{ "wm8997", WM8997 },
> > > +	{ "wm8998", WM8998 },
> 
> > WM1814, WM8997 and WM8998 do not have a SPI interface, which is why they
> > aren't in the table of SPI IDs.
> 
> They're listed as valid DT compatibles for SPI so will now generate
> warnings on boot, the driver should not list those compatibles if
> they're not valid.

Yeah we should really be having different lists for SPI and I2C
here I guess. I am happy to have a quick look at doing a patch
for that, unless you particularly want to fix it up?

Thanks,
Charles