[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210928024946.GA1628@LAPTOP-UKSR4ENP.internal.baidu.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 10:49:46 +0800
From: Cai Huoqing <caihuoqing@...du.com>
To: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
CC: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] iio: adc: meson_saradc: Make use of the helper
function dev_err_probe()
On 27 9月 21 22:09:47, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
> Hello,
>
> first of all: thanks for this patch!
>
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 10:15 AM Cai Huoqing <caihuoqing@...du.com> wrote:
> [...]
> > + if (IS_ERR(priv->clkin))
> > + return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev,
> > + PTR_ERR(priv->clkin),
> Is there any specific reason why you put PTR_ERR() on a separate line?
> it would still fit into the line above and be below the old 80 chars
> per line limit.
> For priv->vref you already have it the way I am suggesting there.
>
> [...]
> > + if (IS_ERR(priv->core_clk))
> > + return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev,
> > + PTR_ERR(priv->core_clk),
> the same question as above applies here as well
>
>
> Best regards,
> Martin
Hi,
Thanks for your feedback.
I have resend v2 to fix it.
here
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20210928013621.1245-6-caihuoqing@baidu.com/
Many thanks
Cai
Powered by blists - more mailing lists