[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJhGHyBwVLpcWoizJaMvQUFhAO_rz4CBQ1=D8hZ2iAadruh7WQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2021 09:26:10 +0800
From: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai+lkml@...il.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Peter Oskolkov <posk@...k.io>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Subject: Re: sched: Remove pointless preemption disable in sched_submit_work()
On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 10:31 PM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
>
> Neither wq_worker_sleeping() nor io_wq_worker_sleeping() require to be invoked
> with preemption disabled:
>
> - The worker flag checks operations only need to be serialized against
> the worker thread itself.
>
> - The accounting and worker pool operations are serialized with locks.
>
> which means that disabling preemption has neither a reason nor a
> value. Remove it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> ---
> kernel/sched/core.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -6327,12 +6327,10 @@ static inline void sched_submit_work(str
> * requires it.
> */
> if (task_flags & (PF_WQ_WORKER | PF_IO_WORKER)) {
Hello
The comment about preemption above this if branch and wq_worker_sleeping()
needs to be removed.
Thanks
Lai
Reviewed-by: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>
> - preempt_disable();
> if (task_flags & PF_WQ_WORKER)
> wq_worker_sleeping(tsk);
> else
> io_wq_worker_sleeping(tsk);
> - preempt_enable_no_resched();
> }
>
> if (tsk_is_pi_blocked(tsk))
Powered by blists - more mailing lists