[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YVSyp0emhzQeMzI4@zn.tnic>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2021 20:38:31 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Sergio Lopez <slp@...hat.com>, Peter Gonda <pgonda@...gle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Dov Murik <dovmurik@...ux.ibm.com>,
Tobin Feldman-Fitzthum <tobin@....com>,
Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, tony.luck@...el.com,
marcorr@...gle.com, sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH Part2 v5 09/45] x86/fault: Add support to dump RMP entry
on fault
On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 10:58:42AM -0500, Brijesh Singh wrote:
> When SEV-SNP is enabled globally, a write from the host goes through the
> RMP check. If the hardware encounters the check failure, then it raises
> the #PF (with RMP set). Dump the RMP entry at the faulting pfn to help
> the debug.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/sev.h | 7 +++++++
> arch/x86/kernel/sev.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/x86/mm/fault.c | 17 +++++++++++----
> include/linux/sev.h | 2 ++
> 4 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/sev.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/sev.h
> index 92ced9626e95..569294f687e6 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/sev.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/sev.h
> @@ -106,6 +106,11 @@ struct __packed rmpentry {
>
> #define rmpentry_assigned(x) ((x)->info.assigned)
> #define rmpentry_pagesize(x) ((x)->info.pagesize)
> +#define rmpentry_vmsa(x) ((x)->info.vmsa)
> +#define rmpentry_asid(x) ((x)->info.asid)
> +#define rmpentry_validated(x) ((x)->info.validated)
> +#define rmpentry_gpa(x) ((unsigned long)(x)->info.gpa)
> +#define rmpentry_immutable(x) ((x)->info.immutable)
If some of those accessors are going to be used only in dump_rmpentry(),
then you don't really need them.
>
> #define RMPADJUST_VMSA_PAGE_BIT BIT(16)
>
> @@ -165,6 +170,7 @@ void __init snp_prep_memory(unsigned long paddr, unsigned int sz, enum psc_op op
> void snp_set_memory_shared(unsigned long vaddr, unsigned int npages);
> void snp_set_memory_private(unsigned long vaddr, unsigned int npages);
> void snp_set_wakeup_secondary_cpu(void);
> +void dump_rmpentry(u64 pfn);
> #ifdef __BOOT_COMPRESSED
> bool sev_snp_enabled(void);
> #else
> @@ -188,6 +194,7 @@ static inline void snp_set_memory_shared(unsigned long vaddr, unsigned int npage
> static inline void snp_set_memory_private(unsigned long vaddr, unsigned int npages) { }
> static inline void snp_set_wakeup_secondary_cpu(void) { }
> static inline void sev_snp_cpuid_init(struct boot_params *bp) { }
> +static inline void dump_rmpentry(u64 pfn) {}
> #ifdef __BOOT_COMPRESSED
> static inline bool sev_snp_enabled { return false; }
> #else
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/sev.c b/arch/x86/kernel/sev.c
> index bad41deb8335..8b3e83e50468 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/sev.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/sev.c
> @@ -2404,6 +2404,49 @@ static struct rmpentry *__snp_lookup_rmpentry(u64 pfn, int *level)
> return entry;
> }
>
> +void dump_rmpentry(u64 pfn)
snp_dump_rmpentry()
> +{
> + unsigned long pfn_end;
> + struct rmpentry *e;
> + int level;
> +
> + e = __snp_lookup_rmpentry(pfn, &level);
> + if (!e) {
> + pr_alert("failed to read RMP entry pfn 0x%llx\n", pfn);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + if (rmpentry_assigned(e)) {
> + pr_alert("RMPEntry paddr 0x%llx [assigned=%d immutable=%d pagesize=%d gpa=0x%lx"
> + " asid=%d vmsa=%d validated=%d]\n", pfn << PAGE_SHIFT,
WARNING: quoted string split across lines
#174: FILE: arch/x86/kernel/sev.c:2421:
+ pr_alert("RMPEntry paddr 0x%llx [assigned=%d immutable=%d pagesize=%d gpa=0x%lx"
+ " asid=%d vmsa=%d validated=%d]\n", pfn << PAGE_SHIFT,
> + rmpentry_assigned(e), rmpentry_immutable(e), rmpentry_pagesize(e),
> + rmpentry_gpa(e), rmpentry_asid(e), rmpentry_vmsa(e),
> + rmpentry_validated(e));
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * If the RMP entry at the faulting pfn was not assigned, then we do not
> + * know what caused the RMP violation. To get some useful debug information,
> + * let iterate through the entire 2MB region, and dump the RMP entries if
> + * one of the bit in the RMP entry is set.
> + */
> + pfn = pfn & ~(PTRS_PER_PMD - 1);
> + pfn_end = pfn + PTRS_PER_PMD;
> +
> + while (pfn < pfn_end) {
> + e = __snp_lookup_rmpentry(pfn, &level);
> + if (!e)
> + return;
return? You mean "continue;" ?
> +
> + if (e->low || e->high)
> + pr_alert("RMPEntry paddr 0x%llx: [high=0x%016llx low=0x%016llx]\n",
> + pfn << PAGE_SHIFT, e->high, e->low);
> + pfn++;
> + }
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dump_rmpentry);
Why is that exported? Some module will be calling it too?
> +
> /*
> * Return 1 if the RMP entry is assigned, 0 if it exists but is not assigned,
> * and -errno if there is no corresponding RMP entry.
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
> index f2d543b92f43..9cd33169dfb5 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
> @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
> #include <asm/pgtable_areas.h> /* VMALLOC_START, ... */
> #include <asm/kvm_para.h> /* kvm_handle_async_pf */
> #include <asm/vdso.h> /* fixup_vdso_exception() */
> +#include <asm/sev.h> /* dump_rmpentry() */
>
> #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
> #include <asm/trace/exceptions.h>
> @@ -289,7 +290,7 @@ static bool low_pfn(unsigned long pfn)
> return pfn < max_low_pfn;
> }
>
> -static void dump_pagetable(unsigned long address)
> +static void dump_pagetable(unsigned long address, bool show_rmpentry)
I think passing in error_code and testing X86_PF_RMP inside should
make this a bit more palatable than simply "grafting" SNP-specific
functionality to generic paths.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists