[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <77aae23f-8c07-845b-90d7-389e1cd1ef5d@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 14:12:52 -0700
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, x86@...nel.org,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Andreas Noever <andreas.noever@...il.com>,
Michael Jamet <michael.jamet@...el.com>,
Yehezkel Bernat <YehezkelShB@...il.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <knsathya@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
"Reshetova, Elena" <elena.reshetova@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] driver core: Add common support to skip probe for
un-authorized devices
> If all you want to do is prevent someone from loading a bunch of
> drivers that you have identified as unhardened, why not just use a
> modprobe blacklist?
That wouldn't help for builtin drivers, we cannot control initcalls.
This LWN article has more details on the background.
https://lwn.net/Articles/865918/
-Andi
> Am I missing something?
>
> Alan Stern
Powered by blists - more mailing lists