[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b7d29bf2-f7b6-1d53-2d59-9c1bb5ee4d84@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 14:19:53 +0300
From: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@...com>, Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@...com>,
Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>,
Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>, Tero Kristo <kristo@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Drew Fustini <pdp7pdp7@...il.com>,
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
"H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@...delico.com>,
Robert Nelson <robertcnelson@...il.com>,
Yongqin Liu <yongqin.liu@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: ti: omap-prm: Fix external abort for am335x pruss
Thanks Tony!
This was _much_ appreciated :)
On 9/30/21 11:01, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> Starting with v5.15-rc1, we may now see some am335x beaglebone black
> device produce the following error on pruss probe:
>
> Unhandled fault: external abort on non-linefetch (0x1008) at 0xe0326000
>
> This has started with the enabling of pruss for am335x in the dts files.
>
> Turns out the is caused by the PRM reset handling not waiting for the
> reset bit to clear. To fix the issue, let's always wait for the reset
> bit to clear, even if there is a separate reset status register.
>
> We attempted to fix a similar issue for dra7 iva with a udelay() in
> commit effe89e40037 ("soc: ti: omap-prm: Fix occasional abort on reset
> deassert for dra7 iva"). There is no longer a need for the udelay()
> for dra7 iva reset either with the check added for reset bit clearing.
>
> Cc: Drew Fustini <pdp7pdp7@...il.com>
> Cc: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
> Cc: "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@...delico.com>
> Cc: Robert Nelson <robertcnelson@...il.com>
> Cc: Yongqin Liu <yongqin.liu@...aro.org>
> Reported-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>
> Fixes: effe89e40037 ("soc: ti: omap-prm: Fix occasional abort on reset deassert for dra7 iva")
Tested-by: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
> ---
> drivers/soc/ti/omap_prm.c | 27 +++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/ti/omap_prm.c b/drivers/soc/ti/omap_prm.c
> --- a/drivers/soc/ti/omap_prm.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/ti/omap_prm.c
> @@ -825,25 +825,28 @@ static int omap_reset_deassert(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,
> writel_relaxed(v, reset->prm->base + reset->prm->data->rstctrl);
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&reset->lock, flags);
>
> - if (!has_rstst)
> - goto exit;
> + /* wait for the reset bit to clear */
> + ret = readl_relaxed_poll_timeout_atomic(reset->prm->base +
> + reset->prm->data->rstctrl,
> + v, !(v & BIT(id)), 1,
> + OMAP_RESET_MAX_WAIT);
> + if (ret)
> + pr_err("%s: timedout waiting for %s:%lu\n", __func__,
> + reset->prm->data->name, id);
If I was writing this I might drop the __func__. AFAIR dyndbg allows
enabling the functipn names to be printed by +f. This is just a 'nit'
though - I am happy if this fix gets in no matter how this print
eventually looks like. I just thought I mention this as the __func__
catched my eye.
>
> /* wait for the status to be set */
> - ret = readl_relaxed_poll_timeout_atomic(reset->prm->base +
> + if (has_rstst) {
> + ret = readl_relaxed_poll_timeout_atomic(reset->prm->base +
> reset->prm->data->rstst,
> v, v & BIT(st_bit), 1,
> OMAP_RESET_MAX_WAIT);
> - if (ret)
> - pr_err("%s: timedout waiting for %s:%lu\n", __func__,
> - reset->prm->data->name, id);
> + if (ret)
> + pr_err("%s: timedout waiting for %s:%lu\n", __func__,
> + reset->prm->data->name, id);
Same here (although that would be unrelated change as the print exists
prior this patch).
I tested this patch on v5.15-rc3 using my BBB Rev C - it seems to fix
the boot issue on my board! Thanks a bunch!
Best Regards
--Matti Vaittinen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists