[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YVWwBz8jrznqXah4@google.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 13:39:35 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
Cc: Will McVicker <willmcvicker@...gle.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
"Cc: Android Kernel" <kernel-team@...roid.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] arm64: Kconfig: Update ARCH_EXYNOS select
configs
On Thu, 30 Sep 2021, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 30/09/2021 11:23, Lee Jones wrote:
> > [0] Full disclosure: part of my role at Linaro is to keep the Android
> > kernel running as close to Mainline as possible and encourage/push the
> > upstream-first mantra, hence my involvement with this and other sets.
> > I assure you all intentions are good and honourable. If you haven't
> > already seen it, please see Todd's most recent update on the goals and
> > status of GKI:
> >
> > Article: https://tinyurl.com/saaen3sp
> > Video: https://youtu.be/O_lCFGinFPM
> >
>
> Side topic, why this patchset is in your scope or Will's/Google's scope?
> Just drop it from Android main kernel, it will not be your problem. I
> mean, really, you don't need this patchset in your tree at all. The only
> platform which needs it, the only platform which will loose something
> will be one specific vendor. Therefore this will be an incentive for
> them to join both discussions and upstream development. :)
How would they fix this besides upstreaming support for unreleased
work-in-progress H/W?
Haven't I explained this several times already? :)
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists