[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <88867104-97f5-1c5f-506a-cfcac0962e55@denx.de>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 17:13:09 +0200
From: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
To: Alexandre TORGUE <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Olivier Moysan <olivier.moysan@...s.st.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] ARM: dts: stm32: fix AV96 board SAI2B pin muxing on
stm32mp15
On 9/30/21 5:05 PM, Alexandre TORGUE wrote:
> On 9/30/21 12:26 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 9/30/21 10:47 AM, Alexandre TORGUE wrote:
>>> Hi Marek
>>>
>>> On 9/29/21 1:18 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>> On 9/27/21 1:45 PM, Olivier Moysan wrote:
>>>>> Fix SAI2B pin muxing for AV96 board on STM32MP15.
>>>>> The label "sai2a-4" is defined twice. Change redundant label to
>>>>> "sai2b-4".
>>>>>
>>>>> Fixes: dcf185ca8175 ("ARM: dts: stm32: Add alternate pinmux for
>>>>> SAI2 pins on stm32mp15")
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Olivier Moysan <olivier.moysan@...s.st.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp15-pinctrl.dtsi | 2 +-
>>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp15-pinctrl.dtsi
>>>>> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp15-pinctrl.dtsi
>>>>> index 5b60ecbd718f..b9cc9e0dd4fc 100644
>>>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp15-pinctrl.dtsi
>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp15-pinctrl.dtsi
>>>>> @@ -1235,7 +1235,7 @@
>>>>> };
>>>>> };
>>>>> - sai2b_pins_c: sai2a-4 {
>>>>> + sai2b_pins_c: sai2b-4 {
>>>>> pins1 {
>>>>> pinmux = <STM32_PINMUX('F', 11, AF10)>; /* SAI2_SD_B */
>>>>> bias-disable;
>>>>
>>>> This mp1 pinmuxing is a total mess, sigh.
>>>
>>> What is the issue here ?
>>
>> The same-old discussion about where to place the pinmux nodes, whether
>> we should have these clusters of pre-defined options in
>> ...pinctrl.dtsi, or whether we should do more nxp-like per-board
>> configuration.
>
> ok it's a bit more precise. Honestly I don't understand why the current
> topology is an issue here. Maybe pinctrl SAI nodes names are not well
> chosen or are not enough explicit. Concerning our topology and the NXP
> ones both exists and both have advantages and drawbacks. For ST boards
> (DK/EV) we want to keep all configs in the same place.
>
> As I prefer to not re open this topic again and again, feel free to add
> your pin config in your dts board file, I'll accept it.
Yes, let's not reopen it. I'm sorry if my grumbling came across as too
strong.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists