[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdbWR_kmvMuHMTOjxLDqN6rq7zhrWcZxfi2L3Atau=TLSw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 17:41:16 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Zhiyong Tao <zhiyong.tao@...iatek.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@...nel.org>,
srv_heupstream <srv_heupstream@...iatek.com>,
hui.liu@...iatek.com, Light Hsieh <light.hsieh@...iatek.com>,
Biao Huang <biao.huang@...iatek.com>,
Hongzhou Yang <hongzhou.yang@...iatek.com>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
Seiya Wang <seiya.wang@...iatek.com>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 2/5] dt-bindings: pinctrl: mt8195: change pull up/down description
Hi Rob,
how do you want me to act with this patch set, as it is already
merged and I was pretty happy since it is a v14 and feeling
it was getting a bit over-reviewed....
Are the binding problems solvable in incremental patches
or do you think I should pull out the patch series?
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists