linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] seq_file: Move seq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 1 Oct 2021 16:39:31 -0700
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, jic23@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] seq_file: Move seq_escape() to a header

On Fri,  1 Oct 2021 15:29:17 +0300 Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:

> Move seq_escape() to the header as inliner.

Some reason for doing this would be nice.  Does it make the kernel
smaller?  Is this performance-sensitive?

> --- a/include/linux/seq_file.h
> +++ b/include/linux/seq_file.h
> @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
>  
>  #include <linux/types.h>
>  #include <linux/string.h>
> +#include <linux/string_helpers.h>

Why was this added?

>  #include <linux/bug.h>
>  #include <linux/mutex.h>
>  #include <linux/cpumask.h>