[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VdQeNnNqVtp00iD6Wo+5GOs1AxSKqSDmxxx6D-AbAJ2AQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2021 10:57:38 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] seq_file: Move seq_escape() to a header
On Sat, Oct 2, 2021 at 2:41 AM Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Oct 2021 15:29:17 +0300 Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> > Move seq_escape() to the header as inliner.
>
> Some reason for doing this would be nice. Does it make the kernel
> smaller? Is this performance-sensitive?
It reduces exported namespace, hence makes it smaller, yes.
...
> > +#include <linux/string_helpers.h>
>
> Why was this added?
The definition of ESCAPE_OCTAL is there.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists