[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8a9a6753-d0b5-3c12-5a5c-17decae3548b@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2021 21:17:33 +0800
From: Tianyu Lan <ltykernel@...il.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: kys@...rosoft.com, haiyangz@...rosoft.com, sthemmin@...rosoft.com,
wei.liu@...nel.org, decui@...rosoft.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, luto@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
arnd@...db.de, brijesh.singh@....com, jroedel@...e.de,
Tianyu.Lan@...rosoft.com, thomas.lendacky@....com,
pgonda@...gle.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, rppt@...nel.org,
kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com, saravanand@...com,
aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com, rientjes@...gle.com, tj@...nel.org,
michael.h.kelley@...rosoft.com, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, vkuznets@...hat.com,
konrad.wilk@...cle.com, hch@....de, robin.murphy@....com,
joro@...tes.org, parri.andrea@...il.com, dave.hansen@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 3/8] x86/hyperv: Add new hvcall guest address host
visibility support
Hi Boris:
Thanks for your review.
On 10/1/2021 2:02 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 09:05:39AM -0400, Tianyu Lan wrote:
>> @@ -1980,15 +1982,11 @@ int set_memory_global(unsigned long addr, int numpages)
>> __pgprot(_PAGE_GLOBAL), 0);
>> }
>>
>> -static int __set_memory_enc_dec(unsigned long addr, int numpages, bool enc)
>> +static int __set_memory_enc_pgtable(unsigned long addr, int numpages, bool enc)
>
> What exactly is that "pgtable" at the end of the name supposed to mean?
>
This was suggested by Dave Hansen. It gets used for the hypervisors
that get informed about "encryption" status via page tables: SEV and TDX.
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/c00e269c-da4c-c703-0182-0221c73a76cc@intel.com/
> So if you want to have different indirections here, I'd suggest you do
> this:
>
> set_memory_encrypted/decrypted() is the external API. It calls
>
> _set_memory_enc_dec() which does your hv_* checks. Note the single
> underscore "_" prefix.
>
> Then, the workhorse remains __set_memory_enc_dec().
>
> Ok?
>
> Also, we're reworking the mem_encrypt_active() accessors:
>
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210928191009.32551-1-bp@alien8.de
>
> so some synchronization when juggling patchsets will be needed. JFYI
> anyway.
Thanks for reminder. I know that patchset and suggested to decouple
dependency among SEV, TDX and Hyper=v patchset.
>
> Also 2, building your set triggers this, dunno if I'm missing some
> patches on my local branch for that.
Thanks for your test. Missing hv_set_register() when CONFIG_HYPERV is
not selected. I will fix it in the next version.
>
> In file included from ./arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h:240,
> from ./include/clocksource/hyperv_timer.h:18,
> from ./arch/x86/include/asm/vdso/gettimeofday.h:21,
> from ./include/vdso/datapage.h:137,
> from ./arch/x86/include/asm/vgtod.h:12,
> from arch/x86/entry/vdso/vma.c:20:
> ./include/asm-generic/mshyperv.h: In function ‘vmbus_signal_eom’:
> ./include/asm-generic/mshyperv.h:153:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘hv_set_register’; did you mean ‘kset_register’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 153 | hv_set_register(HV_REGISTER_EOM, 0);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> | kset_register
> In file included from ./arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h:240,
> from arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c:34:
> ./include/asm-generic/mshyperv.h: In function ‘vmbus_signal_eom’:
> ...
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists