[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6525a915-fd4f-5875-cddd-06aeac5df896@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2021 21:31:55 +0800
From: Tianyu Lan <ltykernel@...il.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: kys@...rosoft.com, haiyangz@...rosoft.com, sthemmin@...rosoft.com,
wei.liu@...nel.org, decui@...rosoft.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, luto@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
arnd@...db.de, brijesh.singh@....com, jroedel@...e.de,
Tianyu.Lan@...rosoft.com, thomas.lendacky@....com,
pgonda@...gle.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, rppt@...nel.org,
kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com, saravanand@...com,
aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com, rientjes@...gle.com, tj@...nel.org,
michael.h.kelley@...rosoft.com, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, vkuznets@...hat.com,
konrad.wilk@...cle.com, hch@....de, robin.murphy@....com,
joro@...tes.org, parri.andrea@...il.com, dave.hansen@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 5/8] x86/hyperv: Add Write/Read MSR registers via ghcb
page
On 10/1/2021 2:20 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 09:05:41AM -0400, Tianyu Lan wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/sev-shared.c b/arch/x86/kernel/sev-shared.c
>> index 9f90f460a28c..dd7f37de640b 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/sev-shared.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/sev-shared.c
>> @@ -94,10 +94,9 @@ static void vc_finish_insn(struct es_em_ctxt *ctxt)
>> ctxt->regs->ip += ctxt->insn.length;
>> }
>>
>> -static enum es_result sev_es_ghcb_hv_call(struct ghcb *ghcb,
>> - struct es_em_ctxt *ctxt,
>> - u64 exit_code, u64 exit_info_1,
>> - u64 exit_info_2)
>> +enum es_result sev_es_ghcb_hv_call_simple(struct ghcb *ghcb,
>> + u64 exit_code, u64 exit_info_1,
>> + u64 exit_info_2)
> Align arguments on the opening brace.
>
> Also, there's nothing "simple" about it - what you've carved out does
> the actual HV call and the trailing part is verifying the HV info. So
> that function should be called
>
> __sev_es_ghcb_hv_call()
>
> and the outer one without the "__".
>
Good suggestion. Will fix it in the next version.
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists