[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAF6AEGs9AB1L-iTsdFzN-rp3AO=ChDEiEfrsPMs8v=gh=9+wmw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2021 11:05:45 -0700
From: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
Cc: dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
freedreno <freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Jordan Crouse <jordan@...micpenguin.net>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>,
Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Jonathan Marek <jonathan@...ek.ca>,
Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>,
Akhil P Oommen <akhilpo@...eaurora.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Sharat Masetty <smasetty@...eaurora.org>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] drm/msm/a6xx: Serialize GMU communication
On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 10:39 AM Dmitry Baryshkov
<dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On 27/09/2021 21:03, Rob Clark wrote:
> > From: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>
> >
> > I've seen some crashes in our crash reporting that *look* like multiple
> > threads stomping on each other while communicating with GMU. So wrap
> > all those paths in a lock.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>
> > ---
> > Are we allowed to use c99/gnu99 yet?
> >
> > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/Makefile | 2 +-
> > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c | 6 ++++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.h | 9 +++++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++-------
> > 4 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/Makefile
> > index 904535eda0c4..57283bbad3f0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/Makefile
> > @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
> > # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > -ccflags-y := -I $(srctree)/$(src)
> > +ccflags-y := -I $(srctree)/$(src) -std=gnu99
> > ccflags-y += -I $(srctree)/$(src)/disp/dpu1
> > ccflags-$(CONFIG_DRM_MSM_DSI) += -I $(srctree)/$(src)/dsi
> > ccflags-$(CONFIG_DRM_MSM_DP) += -I $(srctree)/$(src)/dp
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c
> > index a7c58018959f..8b73f70766a4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c
> > @@ -296,6 +296,8 @@ int a6xx_gmu_set_oob(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu, enum a6xx_gmu_oob_state state)
> > u32 val;
> > int request, ack;
> >
> > + WARN_ON_ONCE(!mutex_is_locked(&gmu->lock));
> > +
> > if (state >= ARRAY_SIZE(a6xx_gmu_oob_bits))
> > return -EINVAL;
> >
> > @@ -337,6 +339,8 @@ void a6xx_gmu_clear_oob(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu, enum a6xx_gmu_oob_state state)
> > {
> > int bit;
> >
> > + WARN_ON_ONCE(!mutex_is_locked(&gmu->lock));
> > +
> > if (state >= ARRAY_SIZE(a6xx_gmu_oob_bits))
> > return;
> >
> > @@ -1482,6 +1486,8 @@ int a6xx_gmu_init(struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu, struct device_node *node)
> > if (!pdev)
> > return -ENODEV;
> >
> > + mutex_init(&gmu->lock);
> > +
> > gmu->dev = &pdev->dev;
> >
> > of_dma_configure(gmu->dev, node, true);
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.h
> > index 3c74f64e3126..f05a00c0afd0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.h
> > @@ -44,6 +44,9 @@ struct a6xx_gmu_bo {
> > struct a6xx_gmu {
> > struct device *dev;
> >
> > + /* For serializing communication with the GMU: */
> > + struct mutex lock;
> > +
> > struct msm_gem_address_space *aspace;
> >
> > void * __iomem mmio;
> > @@ -88,6 +91,12 @@ struct a6xx_gmu {
> > bool legacy; /* a618 or a630 */
> > };
> >
> > +/* Helper macro for serializing GMU access: */
> > +#define with_gmu_lock(gmu) \
> > + for (bool done = ({ mutex_lock(&(gmu)->lock); false; }); \
> > + !done; \
> > + done = ({ mutex_unlock(&(gmu)->lock); true; }))
>
> The intent is good, but I'm not sure this kind of syntax sugar would be
> a good approach. What about calling lock/unlock explicitly, like we
> typically do? Then we won't have to use c99.
Yeah, I was planning to resend without the sugar.. but it was a good
excuse to bring up c99. Ie. I want c99 regardless ;-)
(The sugar was useful initially before I'd sorted thru all the code
paths and settled on using a mutex vs spinlock)
BR,
-R
> > +
> > static inline u32 gmu_read(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu, u32 offset)
> > {
> > return msm_readl(gmu->mmio + (offset << 2));
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
> > index f6a4dbef796b..5e1ae3df42ba 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
> > @@ -881,7 +881,7 @@ static int a6xx_zap_shader_init(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
> > A6XX_RBBM_INT_0_MASK_UCHE_OOB_ACCESS | \
> > A6XX_RBBM_INT_0_MASK_UCHE_TRAP_INTR)
> >
> > -static int a6xx_hw_init(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
> > +static int hw_init(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
> > {
> > struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu = to_adreno_gpu(gpu);
> > struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu = to_a6xx_gpu(adreno_gpu);
> > @@ -1135,6 +1135,19 @@ static int a6xx_hw_init(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > +static int a6xx_hw_init(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
> > +{
> > + struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu = to_adreno_gpu(gpu);
> > + struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu = to_a6xx_gpu(adreno_gpu);
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + with_gmu_lock(&a6xx_gpu->gmu) {
> > + ret = hw_init(gpu);
> > + }
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > static void a6xx_dump(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
> > {
> > DRM_DEV_INFO(&gpu->pdev->dev, "status: %08x\n",
> > @@ -1509,7 +1522,9 @@ static int a6xx_pm_resume(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
> >
> > trace_msm_gpu_resume(0);
> >
> > - ret = a6xx_gmu_resume(a6xx_gpu);
> > + with_gmu_lock(&a6xx_gpu->gmu) {
> > + ret = a6xx_gmu_resume(a6xx_gpu);
> > + }
> > if (ret)
> > return ret;
> >
> > @@ -1532,7 +1547,9 @@ static int a6xx_pm_suspend(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
> >
> > msm_devfreq_suspend(gpu);
> >
> > - ret = a6xx_gmu_stop(a6xx_gpu);
> > + with_gmu_lock(&a6xx_gpu->gmu) {
> > + ret = a6xx_gmu_stop(a6xx_gpu);
> > + }
> > if (ret)
> > return ret;
> >
> > @@ -1547,18 +1564,17 @@ static int a6xx_get_timestamp(struct msm_gpu *gpu, uint64_t *value)
> > {
> > struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu = to_adreno_gpu(gpu);
> > struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu = to_a6xx_gpu(adreno_gpu);
> > - static DEFINE_MUTEX(perfcounter_oob);
> >
> > - mutex_lock(&perfcounter_oob);
> > + with_gmu_lock(&a6xx_gpu->gmu) {
> > + /* Force the GPU power on so we can read this register */
> > + a6xx_gmu_set_oob(&a6xx_gpu->gmu, GMU_OOB_PERFCOUNTER_SET);
> >
> > - /* Force the GPU power on so we can read this register */
> > - a6xx_gmu_set_oob(&a6xx_gpu->gmu, GMU_OOB_PERFCOUNTER_SET);
> > + *value = gpu_read64(gpu, REG_A6XX_CP_ALWAYS_ON_COUNTER_LO,
> > + REG_A6XX_CP_ALWAYS_ON_COUNTER_HI);
> >
> > - *value = gpu_read64(gpu, REG_A6XX_CP_ALWAYS_ON_COUNTER_LO,
> > - REG_A6XX_CP_ALWAYS_ON_COUNTER_HI);
> > + a6xx_gmu_clear_oob(&a6xx_gpu->gmu, GMU_OOB_PERFCOUNTER_SET);
> > + }
> >
> > - a6xx_gmu_clear_oob(&a6xx_gpu->gmu, GMU_OOB_PERFCOUNTER_SET);
> > - mutex_unlock(&perfcounter_oob);
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -1622,6 +1638,16 @@ static unsigned long a6xx_gpu_busy(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
> > return (unsigned long)busy_time;
> > }
> >
> > +void a6xx_gpu_set_freq(struct msm_gpu *gpu, struct dev_pm_opp *opp)
> > +{
> > + struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu = to_adreno_gpu(gpu);
> > + struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu = to_a6xx_gpu(adreno_gpu);
> > +
> > + with_gmu_lock(&a6xx_gpu->gmu) {
> > + a6xx_gmu_set_freq(gpu, opp);
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > static struct msm_gem_address_space *
> > a6xx_create_address_space(struct msm_gpu *gpu, struct platform_device *pdev)
> > {
> > @@ -1766,7 +1792,7 @@ static const struct adreno_gpu_funcs funcs = {
> > #endif
> > .gpu_busy = a6xx_gpu_busy,
> > .gpu_get_freq = a6xx_gmu_get_freq,
> > - .gpu_set_freq = a6xx_gmu_set_freq,
> > + .gpu_set_freq = a6xx_gpu_set_freq,
> > #if defined(CONFIG_DRM_MSM_GPU_STATE)
> > .gpu_state_get = a6xx_gpu_state_get,
> > .gpu_state_put = a6xx_gpu_state_put,
> >
>
>
> --
> With best wishes
> Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists