[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <30337639-00d3-cc37-123a-6a0b73de14c4@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2021 21:02:24 +0300
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>
Cc: dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
freedreno <freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Jordan Crouse <jordan@...micpenguin.net>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>,
Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Jonathan Marek <jonathan@...ek.ca>,
Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>,
Akhil P Oommen <akhilpo@...eaurora.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Sharat Masetty <smasetty@...eaurora.org>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] drm/msm/a6xx: Serialize GMU communication
On 01/10/2021 21:05, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 10:39 AM Dmitry Baryshkov
> <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 27/09/2021 21:03, Rob Clark wrote:
>>> From: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>
>>>
>>> I've seen some crashes in our crash reporting that *look* like multiple
>>> threads stomping on each other while communicating with GMU. So wrap
>>> all those paths in a lock.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>
>>> ---
>>> Are we allowed to use c99/gnu99 yet?
>>>
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/Makefile | 2 +-
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c | 6 ++++
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.h | 9 +++++
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++-------
>>> 4 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/Makefile
>>> index 904535eda0c4..57283bbad3f0 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/Makefile
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/Makefile
>>> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
>>> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>>> -ccflags-y := -I $(srctree)/$(src)
>>> +ccflags-y := -I $(srctree)/$(src) -std=gnu99
>>> ccflags-y += -I $(srctree)/$(src)/disp/dpu1
>>> ccflags-$(CONFIG_DRM_MSM_DSI) += -I $(srctree)/$(src)/dsi
>>> ccflags-$(CONFIG_DRM_MSM_DP) += -I $(srctree)/$(src)/dp
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c
>>> index a7c58018959f..8b73f70766a4 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c
>>> @@ -296,6 +296,8 @@ int a6xx_gmu_set_oob(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu, enum a6xx_gmu_oob_state state)
>>> u32 val;
>>> int request, ack;
>>>
>>> + WARN_ON_ONCE(!mutex_is_locked(&gmu->lock));
>>> +
>>> if (state >= ARRAY_SIZE(a6xx_gmu_oob_bits))
>>> return -EINVAL;
>>>
>>> @@ -337,6 +339,8 @@ void a6xx_gmu_clear_oob(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu, enum a6xx_gmu_oob_state state)
>>> {
>>> int bit;
>>>
>>> + WARN_ON_ONCE(!mutex_is_locked(&gmu->lock));
>>> +
>>> if (state >= ARRAY_SIZE(a6xx_gmu_oob_bits))
>>> return;
>>>
>>> @@ -1482,6 +1486,8 @@ int a6xx_gmu_init(struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu, struct device_node *node)
>>> if (!pdev)
>>> return -ENODEV;
>>>
>>> + mutex_init(&gmu->lock);
>>> +
>>> gmu->dev = &pdev->dev;
>>>
>>> of_dma_configure(gmu->dev, node, true);
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.h
>>> index 3c74f64e3126..f05a00c0afd0 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.h
>>> @@ -44,6 +44,9 @@ struct a6xx_gmu_bo {
>>> struct a6xx_gmu {
>>> struct device *dev;
>>>
>>> + /* For serializing communication with the GMU: */
>>> + struct mutex lock;
>>> +
>>> struct msm_gem_address_space *aspace;
>>>
>>> void * __iomem mmio;
>>> @@ -88,6 +91,12 @@ struct a6xx_gmu {
>>> bool legacy; /* a618 or a630 */
>>> };
>>>
>>> +/* Helper macro for serializing GMU access: */
>>> +#define with_gmu_lock(gmu) \
>>> + for (bool done = ({ mutex_lock(&(gmu)->lock); false; }); \
>>> + !done; \
>>> + done = ({ mutex_unlock(&(gmu)->lock); true; }))
>>
>> The intent is good, but I'm not sure this kind of syntax sugar would be
>> a good approach. What about calling lock/unlock explicitly, like we
>> typically do? Then we won't have to use c99.
>
> Yeah, I was planning to resend without the sugar.. but it was a good
> excuse to bring up c99. Ie. I want c99 regardless ;-)
>
> (The sugar was useful initially before I'd sorted thru all the code
> paths and settled on using a mutex vs spinlock)
We can always have GMU_LOCK/GMU_UNLOCK macros.
>
> BR,
> -R
>
>>> +
>>> static inline u32 gmu_read(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu, u32 offset)
>>> {
>>> return msm_readl(gmu->mmio + (offset << 2));
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
>>> index f6a4dbef796b..5e1ae3df42ba 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
>>> @@ -881,7 +881,7 @@ static int a6xx_zap_shader_init(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>>> A6XX_RBBM_INT_0_MASK_UCHE_OOB_ACCESS | \
>>> A6XX_RBBM_INT_0_MASK_UCHE_TRAP_INTR)
>>>
>>> -static int a6xx_hw_init(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>>> +static int hw_init(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>>> {
>>> struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu = to_adreno_gpu(gpu);
>>> struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu = to_a6xx_gpu(adreno_gpu);
>>> @@ -1135,6 +1135,19 @@ static int a6xx_hw_init(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>>> return ret;
>>> }
>>>
>>> +static int a6xx_hw_init(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>>> +{
>>> + struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu = to_adreno_gpu(gpu);
>>> + struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu = to_a6xx_gpu(adreno_gpu);
>>> + int ret;
>>> +
>>> + with_gmu_lock(&a6xx_gpu->gmu) {
>>> + ret = hw_init(gpu);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + return ret;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> static void a6xx_dump(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>>> {
>>> DRM_DEV_INFO(&gpu->pdev->dev, "status: %08x\n",
>>> @@ -1509,7 +1522,9 @@ static int a6xx_pm_resume(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>>>
>>> trace_msm_gpu_resume(0);
>>>
>>> - ret = a6xx_gmu_resume(a6xx_gpu);
>>> + with_gmu_lock(&a6xx_gpu->gmu) {
>>> + ret = a6xx_gmu_resume(a6xx_gpu);
>>> + }
>>> if (ret)
>>> return ret;
>>>
>>> @@ -1532,7 +1547,9 @@ static int a6xx_pm_suspend(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>>>
>>> msm_devfreq_suspend(gpu);
>>>
>>> - ret = a6xx_gmu_stop(a6xx_gpu);
>>> + with_gmu_lock(&a6xx_gpu->gmu) {
>>> + ret = a6xx_gmu_stop(a6xx_gpu);
>>> + }
>>> if (ret)
>>> return ret;
>>>
>>> @@ -1547,18 +1564,17 @@ static int a6xx_get_timestamp(struct msm_gpu *gpu, uint64_t *value)
>>> {
>>> struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu = to_adreno_gpu(gpu);
>>> struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu = to_a6xx_gpu(adreno_gpu);
>>> - static DEFINE_MUTEX(perfcounter_oob);
>>>
>>> - mutex_lock(&perfcounter_oob);
>>> + with_gmu_lock(&a6xx_gpu->gmu) {
>>> + /* Force the GPU power on so we can read this register */
>>> + a6xx_gmu_set_oob(&a6xx_gpu->gmu, GMU_OOB_PERFCOUNTER_SET);
>>>
>>> - /* Force the GPU power on so we can read this register */
>>> - a6xx_gmu_set_oob(&a6xx_gpu->gmu, GMU_OOB_PERFCOUNTER_SET);
>>> + *value = gpu_read64(gpu, REG_A6XX_CP_ALWAYS_ON_COUNTER_LO,
>>> + REG_A6XX_CP_ALWAYS_ON_COUNTER_HI);
>>>
>>> - *value = gpu_read64(gpu, REG_A6XX_CP_ALWAYS_ON_COUNTER_LO,
>>> - REG_A6XX_CP_ALWAYS_ON_COUNTER_HI);
>>> + a6xx_gmu_clear_oob(&a6xx_gpu->gmu, GMU_OOB_PERFCOUNTER_SET);
>>> + }
>>>
>>> - a6xx_gmu_clear_oob(&a6xx_gpu->gmu, GMU_OOB_PERFCOUNTER_SET);
>>> - mutex_unlock(&perfcounter_oob);
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>>
>>> @@ -1622,6 +1638,16 @@ static unsigned long a6xx_gpu_busy(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>>> return (unsigned long)busy_time;
>>> }
>>>
>>> +void a6xx_gpu_set_freq(struct msm_gpu *gpu, struct dev_pm_opp *opp)
>>> +{
>>> + struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu = to_adreno_gpu(gpu);
>>> + struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu = to_a6xx_gpu(adreno_gpu);
>>> +
>>> + with_gmu_lock(&a6xx_gpu->gmu) {
>>> + a6xx_gmu_set_freq(gpu, opp);
>>> + }
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> static struct msm_gem_address_space *
>>> a6xx_create_address_space(struct msm_gpu *gpu, struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> {
>>> @@ -1766,7 +1792,7 @@ static const struct adreno_gpu_funcs funcs = {
>>> #endif
>>> .gpu_busy = a6xx_gpu_busy,
>>> .gpu_get_freq = a6xx_gmu_get_freq,
>>> - .gpu_set_freq = a6xx_gmu_set_freq,
>>> + .gpu_set_freq = a6xx_gpu_set_freq,
>>> #if defined(CONFIG_DRM_MSM_GPU_STATE)
>>> .gpu_state_get = a6xx_gpu_state_get,
>>> .gpu_state_put = a6xx_gpu_state_put,
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> With best wishes
>> Dmitry
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists