[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YVdR4bdpr9/E+GNf@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2021 21:22:25 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: Orlando Chamberlain <redecorating@...tonmail.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: intel-lpss: Add support for MacBookPro16,2 UART
On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 07:14:12PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Fri, 01 Oct 2021, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 08:51:46AM +0000, Orlando Chamberlain wrote:
...
> > > + /* MacBookPro16,2 */
> >
> > Use
> >
> > /* ICL-N */
> >
> > here.
>
> Why is that?
It's a standard way of representing PCH/SoC in the comments in this driver:
- MacBookPro16,2 is not a name of the PCH/SoC
- MacBookPro16,2 is possible not the solely hardware of this chip
Why not to mention this name in the commit message?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists