lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2021 14:42:54 -0700 From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> To: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>, Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>, Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] docs: Explain the desired position of function attributes On Sat, Oct 02, 2021 at 06:27:02PM +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote: > On Sat, Oct 2, 2021 at 5:22 PM Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote: > > > > If automated scripts exist to change all the code to that new > > 'one true way', it wouldn't be applied. > > I think nobody is saying we should reformat all code at once, just > that agreeing on a given style allows us to eventually automate it (it > also makes humans more likely to be consistent). I just want to know what style to use to not have it NAKed by Linus. ;) But yeah, it might be nice to do style checking against the kernel some day. We have a lot of weird stuff in here, though! *slaps roof of kernel* -- Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists