linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] checksyscalls: Unconditionally ignore fstat{,at}64

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK8P3a3-VffaUQmQ=w8CNCEWarm9JFqwEAXrEGqr9Dj3khRV2A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 3 Oct 2021 17:27:21 +0200
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@...gle.com>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@...roid.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checksyscalls: Unconditionally ignore fstat{,at}64

On Sun, Oct 3, 2021 at 2:56 AM Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com> wrote:
>
> From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@...gle.com>
>
> These can be replaced by statx().  Since rv32 has a 64-bit time_t we
> just never ended up with them in the first place.
>
> Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@...gle.com>

Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>

> Happy to take this through the RISC-V tree, as it's fixing a build warning
> (that's being promoted to an error for me, not sure why).  I'm just not all
> that familiar with how this one works.
>
> Arnd suggested putting these here, but not exactly doing it this way.

Merging it through your tree sounds good.