lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2021 09:51:29 +0300 From: Mikko Perttunen <cyndis@...si.fi> To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>, Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@...dia.com> Cc: rafael@...nel.org, thierry.reding@...il.com, jonathanh@...dia.com, krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com, lorenzo.pieralisi@....com, robh@...nel.org, kw@...ux.com, p.zabel@...gutronix.de, rui.zhang@...el.com, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, amitk@...nel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] cpufreq: tegra186/tegra194: Handle errors in BPMP response On 10/4/21 9:37 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 15-09-21, 11:55, Mikko Perttunen wrote: >> The return value from tegra_bpmp_transfer indicates the success or >> failure of the IPC transaction with BPMP. If the transaction >> succeeded, we also need to check the actual command's result code. >> Add code to do this. >> >> While at it, explicitly handle missing CPU clusters, which can >> occur on floorswept chips. This worked before as well, but >> possibly only by accident. >> >> Signed-off-by: Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@...dia.com> >> --- >> drivers/cpufreq/tegra186-cpufreq.c | 4 ++++ >> drivers/cpufreq/tegra194-cpufreq.c | 8 +++++++- >> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > Should I apply it alone ? > Yes please, all of these patches are independent of each other. Mikko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists