[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211006003325.6106cfab@coco.lan>
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2021 00:33:25 +0200
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
To: Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, linuxarm@...wei.com,
mauro.chehab@...wei.com,
Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
Binghui Wang <wangbinghui@...ilicon.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Xiaowei Song <songxiaowei@...ilicon.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 03/11] PCI: kirin: Add support for a PHY layer
Hi Pali,
Em Tue, 5 Oct 2021 22:31:48 +0200
Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org> escreveu:
> Hello!
>
> On Tuesday 28 September 2021 09:34:13 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > The pcie-kirin driver contains both PHY and generic PCI driver
> > on it.
> >
> > The best would be, instead, to support a PCI PHY driver, making
> > the driver more generic.
> >
> > However, it is too late to remove the Kirin 960 PHY, as a change
> > like that would make the DT schema incompatible with past versions.
>
> I have not looked deeply at it. But is not it really possible to declare
> PHY node in DTS file with backward compatible manner? Or cannot Rob help
> with it (maybe there was similar issue in past with other driver)?
It would be possible to split the Kirin 960 PHY into drivers/phy. It is
also possible to hack the phy driver to search for the PHY-specific data
inside the PCI compatible string (I did wrote some patches doing that
and sent as a RFC several months ago), but the problem is that the
PHY driver won't be probed without adding a new compatible inside the
DT schema. By doing that, the schema will be incompatible.
In any case, the patches on this series split all PHY-specific code
inside the driver on a separate part of the source code. Moving it
to a new driver would be easy once someone comes with a solution
to add some new method at the PHY layer that would allow to load a
new module without having a compatible for it.
> I was fixing something similar, address space defined in DTS was used by
> two HW blocks: clock and UART. And I was able to make both DTS file and
> driver backward compatible.
Thanks,
Mauro
Powered by blists - more mailing lists