linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 05/10] riscv: remove Kconfig check for GCC version for ARCH

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <mhng-387507df-2708-4ea1-9854-780fcb35eb1d@palmerdabbelt-glaptop>
Date:   Mon, 04 Oct 2021 17:40:42 -0700 (PDT)
From:   Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>
To:     ndesaulniers@...gle.com, keescook@...omium.org
CC:     ndesaulniers@...gle.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux@...musvillemoes.dk, nathan@...nel.org, masahiroy@...nel.org,
        joe@...ches.com, arnd@...nel.org,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        aou@...s.berkeley.edu, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject:     Re: [PATCH 05/10] riscv: remove Kconfig check for GCC version for ARCH_RV64I

On Mon, 13 Sep 2021 09:23:45 PDT (-0700), keescook@...omium.org wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 04:40:42PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
>> The minimum supported version of GCC is now 5.1. The check wasn't
>> correct as written anyways since GCC_VERSION is 0 when CC=clang.
>>
>> Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>
>> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>
>> Cc: Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>
>> Cc: linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
>> Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
>
> Yeah, good catch for Clang too.
>
> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>

Reviewed-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@...gle.com>
Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@...gle.com>

Only this patch ended up in my inbox.  Where you guys planning on 
keeping this whole series together, or did you want me to pick this for 
the RISC-V tree?