lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2021 10:28:40 +0200 From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com> To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>, Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] docs: Explain the desired position of function attributes On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 1:57 AM Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net> wrote: > > In this case I think we're as close as to consensus as things get. In > the absence of a strong reason to the contrary, I'll apply this before > too long. No strong reason, but there was the question about the `__malloc` in a separate line in the second example which seems to contradict the declaration and it is not explained otherwise (+ clang-format does it differently). Cheers, Miguel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists