[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiq72mTmYCJ4_7KVRMMKCDTMrnE9wCXBKViCMzkW1ErpdZKHg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2021 10:28:40 +0200
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] docs: Explain the desired position of function attributes
On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 1:57 AM Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net> wrote:
>
> In this case I think we're as close as to consensus as things get. In
> the absence of a strong reason to the contrary, I'll apply this before
> too long.
No strong reason, but there was the question about the `__malloc` in a
separate line in the second example which seems to contradict the
declaration and it is not explained otherwise (+ clang-format does it
differently).
Cheers,
Miguel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists