[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YVxP0+kVxI0xQmQQ@google.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2021 14:14:59 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] regulator/mfd/clock: dt-bindings: Samsung S2M
and S5M to dtschema
On Tue, 05 Oct 2021, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 11:40:56AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>
> > Merging/dependencies
> > ====================
> > 1. Regulator related binding changes depend on first two commits (the
> > fixes), because of context.
> > 2. The mfd bindings depend on clock and regulator bindings.
> >
> > The fixes and bindings changes (patches 1-10) should go via the same
> > tree. For example regulator or mfd tree. I propose the regulator tree,
> > since it will have also one driver change (the fix, first commit).
>
> Lee, Stephen, Michael does Krzysztof's plan make sense to you?
I tend to take cross subsystem patches. MFD is usually in the centre
of these scenarios and I have tooling to easily set-up immutable
branches/pull-requests.
Always happy to discuss if others have different/better ideas though.
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists