[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YVxBuEvHVdyDvaGD@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2021 13:14:48 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] regulator/mfd/clock: dt-bindings: Samsung S2M
and S5M to dtschema
On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 11:40:56AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Merging/dependencies
> ====================
> 1. Regulator related binding changes depend on first two commits (the
> fixes), because of context.
> 2. The mfd bindings depend on clock and regulator bindings.
>
> The fixes and bindings changes (patches 1-10) should go via the same
> tree. For example regulator or mfd tree. I propose the regulator tree,
> since it will have also one driver change (the fix, first commit).
Lee, Stephen, Michael does Krzysztof's plan make sense to you?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists