[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2f590036-52db-bcdc-571a-361dd8b8dc19@marcan.st>
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2021 01:11:04 +0900
From: Hector Martin <marcan@...can.st>
To: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@...enzweig.io>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@...all.nl>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] soc: apple: Add driver for Apple PMGR power state
controls
On 06/10/2021 18.24, Philipp Zabel wrote:
>> +static int apple_pmgr_reset_reset(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev, unsigned long id)
>> +{
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = apple_pmgr_reset_assert(rcdev, id);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + usleep_range(APPLE_PMGR_RESET_TIME, 2 * APPLE_PMGR_RESET_TIME);
>
> Is this delay known to be long enough for all consumers using the
> reset_control_reset() functionality? Are there any users at all?
I tested this for UART and ANS outside of Linux, and found that even
back to back register writes worked, so the 1us thing is already
conservative. I have no idea if we'll run into some weirdo block that
needs more time, though. If we do then this will have to be bumped or
turned into a property.
> Is it ok for a genpd transition to happen during this sleep?
I expect consumers to call reset while the device is active; it won't
even work without that, as the reset is synchronous and just doesn't
take effect while clock gated (at least for UART). See the dev_err()s
that fire when that happens.
--
Hector Martin (marcan@...can.st)
Public Key: https://mrcn.st/pub
Powered by blists - more mailing lists