linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 00/14] blk-mq: Reduce static requests memory footprint for shared sbitmap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0da031cb-427b-abd8-368d-d242e8c844c8@huawei.com>
Date:   Fri, 8 Oct 2021 09:07:25 +0100
From:   John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
To:     Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
        Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@...adcom.com>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
CC:     <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <ming.lei@...hat.com>, <hare@...e.de>,
        <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/14] blk-mq: Reduce static requests memory footprint
 for shared sbitmap

On 08/10/2021 04:11, Bart Van Assche wrote:

+

> On 10/7/21 13:31, Kashyap Desai wrote:
>> I tested this patchset on 5.15-rc4 (master) -
>> https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
>>
>> #1 I noticed some performance regression @mq-deadline scheduler which 
>> is not
>> related to this series. I will bisect and get more detail about this 
>> issue
>> separately.
> 
> Please test this patch series on top of Jens' for-next branch 
> (git://git.kernel.dk/linux-block). The mq-deadline performance on Jens' 
> for-next branch should match that of kernel v5.13.

Kashyap did also mention earlier that he say the drop from v5.11 -> v5.12.

The only thing I saw possibly related there was Jan's work in 
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20210111164717.21937-1-jack@suse.cz/
to fix a performance regression witnessed on megaraid sas for slower media.

But I quite doubtful that this is the issue.

Thanks,
John