[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1830c3cc-635a-ab59-e217-f48fca8d9cf5@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2021 19:16:08 -0700
From: "Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan"
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
x86@...nel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>, Deep Shah <sdeep@...are.com>,
VMware Inc <pv-drivers@...are.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Peter H Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <knsathya@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 09/11] x86/tdx: Add MSR support for TDX guest
On 10/6/21 12:49 PM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 04, 2021 at 07:52:03PM -0700, Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/tdx.c b/arch/x86/kernel/tdx.c
>> index 3d0416515506..062ac4720434 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/tdx.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/tdx.c
>> @@ -110,6 +110,41 @@ static __cpuidle void tdx_safe_halt(void)
>> _tdx_halt(irq_disabled, do_sti);
>> }
>>
>> +static u64 tdx_read_msr_safe(unsigned int msr, int *err)
>
> Here the kernel convention would probably be to return the error and
> make 'val' an argument:
>
> static int tdx_read_msr_safe(unsigned int msr, u64 *val)
Agree. I will fix this in next version.
>
>
>> +{
>> + struct tdx_hypercall_output out = {0};
>> + u64 ret;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Emulate the MSR read via hypercall. More info about ABI
>> + * can be found in TDX Guest-Host-Communication Interface
>> + * (GHCI), sec titled "TDG.VP.VMCALL<Instruction.RDMSR>".
>> + */
>> + ret = _tdx_hypercall(EXIT_REASON_MSR_READ, msr, 0, 0, 0, &out);
>> +
>> + *err = ret ? -EIO : 0;
>> +
>> + return out.r11;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int tdx_write_msr_safe(unsigned int msr, unsigned int low,
>> + unsigned int high)
>> +{
>> + u64 ret;
>> +
>> + WARN_ON_ONCE(tdx_is_context_switched_msr(msr));
>
> This fails to build, tdx_is_context_switched_msr() is missing.
>
>> @@ -136,19 +171,33 @@ unsigned long tdx_get_ve_info(struct ve_info *ve)
>> int tdx_handle_virtualization_exception(struct pt_regs *regs,
>> struct ve_info *ve)
>> {
>> + unsigned long val;
>> + int ret = 0;
>> +
>> switch (ve->exit_reason) {
>> case EXIT_REASON_HLT:
>> tdx_halt();
>> break;
>> + case EXIT_REASON_MSR_READ:
>> + val = tdx_read_msr_safe(regs->cx, (unsigned int *)&ret);
>
> Why the 'unsigned int *' cast?
>
> Also, 'val' should have the same type as the one returned by
> tdx_read_msr_safe(). (Though it technically doesn't matter here.)
I will change val type to u64. It will not need any casting.
>
--
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
Linux Kernel Developer
Powered by blists - more mailing lists