linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 0/8] dt-bindings: memory-controllers: ti,gpmc: Convert to yaml

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 9 Oct 2021 16:55:47 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
To:     Roger Quadros <rogerq@...nel.org>, tony@...mide.com,
        Miquèl Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
Cc:     robh+dt@...nel.org, grygorii.strashko@...com, nm@...com,
        nsekhar@...com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/8] dt-bindings: memory-controllers: ti,gpmc: Convert
 to yaml

On 08/10/2021 21:10, Roger Quadros wrote:
> Krzysztof,
> 
> On 07/10/2021 20:37, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 07/10/2021 14:08, Roger Quadros wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> This series converts ti,gpmc memory controller and ti,gpmc-nand and
>>> ti,gpmc-onenand MTD controller bindings to yaml.
>>>
>>> cheers,
>>> -roger
>>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Although you did not mention it here, it looks like you have some
>> dependencies between the patches. Maybe this shall go simply via Rob's tree?
>>
> 
> Rob has acked all the DT binding patches.
> So it is upto you and Miquèl to decide the best way. MTD tree or Memory controller tree
> for the dt-bindings patches.
> 
> The ARM: dts changes should go via Tony's OMAP SoC tree.
> 
> Or if Tony is OK with it then maybe all patches can go via Tony's tree? :)
> 


I reviewed the two memory-controller patches, so feel free to take them
via MTD or OMAP SoC.


Best regards,
Krzysztof