[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YWPRbmaJQN85wRIO@atomide.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 08:53:50 +0300
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
Cc: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...nel.org>,
Miquèl Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
robh+dt@...nel.org, grygorii.strashko@...com, nm@...com,
nsekhar@...com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/8] dt-bindings: memory-controllers: ti,gpmc: Convert
to yaml
* Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com> [211009 14:56]:
> On 08/10/2021 21:10, Roger Quadros wrote:
> > Krzysztof,
> >
> > On 07/10/2021 20:37, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> On 07/10/2021 14:08, Roger Quadros wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> This series converts ti,gpmc memory controller and ti,gpmc-nand and
> >>> ti,gpmc-onenand MTD controller bindings to yaml.
> >>>
> >>> cheers,
> >>> -roger
> >>>
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Although you did not mention it here, it looks like you have some
> >> dependencies between the patches. Maybe this shall go simply via Rob's tree?
> >>
> >
> > Rob has acked all the DT binding patches.
> > So it is upto you and Miquèl to decide the best way. MTD tree or Memory controller tree
> > for the dt-bindings patches.
> >
> > The ARM: dts changes should go via Tony's OMAP SoC tree.
> >
> > Or if Tony is OK with it then maybe all patches can go via Tony's tree? :)
> >
>
>
> I reviewed the two memory-controller patches, so feel free to take them
> via MTD or OMAP SoC.
Sounds like I should pick up these because of the dts changes.
Thanks,
Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists