| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2021 23:44:12 +0530
From: Saurav Girepunje <saurav.girepunje@...il.com>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
fabioaiuto83@...il.com, ross.schm.dev@...il.com,
deborahbrouwer3563@...il.com, marcocesati@...il.com,
phil@...lpotter.co.uk, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: saurav.girepunje@...mail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: core: simplify the if condition
On 09/10/21 10:21 pm, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 10/9/21 8:00 AM, Saurav Girepunje wrote:
>> if psta is NULL, function is returning with fail. On next if condition
>> again checking if psta is not a NULL. Remove multiple if condition check.
>>
>> Function is already using goto exit statement to exit.Replace multiple
>> return with goto exit statement.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Saurav Girepunje <saurav.girepunje@...il.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_xmit.c | 61 ++++++++++-------------
>> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_xmit.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_xmit.c
>> index 34505b35a7f3..4e4a1bed882b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_xmit.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_xmit.c
>> @@ -932,49 +932,40 @@ s32 rtw_make_wlanhdr(struct adapter *padapter, u8 *hdr, struct pkt_attrib *pattr
>> /* TODO: fill HT Control Field */
>>
>> /* Update Seq Num will be handled by f/w */
>> - {
>> - struct sta_info *psta;
>> -
>> - psta = rtw_get_stainfo(&padapter->stapriv, pattrib->ra);
>> - if (pattrib->psta != psta)
>> - return _FAIL;
>> -
>> - if (!psta)
>> - return _FAIL;
>> + struct sta_info *psta;
>
> You are now declaring a variable after some statements, this will
> cause a compiler warning in some cases. Please move this variable
> declaration up, grouping it together with the other variable
> declarations.
>
Yes, I will move variable declaration to up.
>>
>> - if (!(psta->state & _FW_LINKED))
>> - return _FAIL;
>> + psta = rtw_get_stainfo(&padapter->stapriv, pattrib->ra);
>> + if (!psta || pattrib->psta != psta || !(psta->state & _FW_LINKED))
>> + res = _FAIL;
>> + goto exit;
>
> You are both removing an identation level here because you are removing
> the compound statement which contained the psta declaration as well
> as refactoring the code.
>
> Please split this into 2 separate commits, 1 where you only drop the
> extra indentation level (and move the psta declaration up).
>
> And then a separate commit which just the actual code changes.
>
> Your current patch is very hard to review because you are doing
> 2 things at once.
>
> Also it looks like this patch depends on your previous patch:
> "[PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: core: remove empty else section"
>
> When patches depend on each other please send them together
> as a single patch series. E.g. for version 2 (v2) of a 3 patch
> series consisting of the last 3 commits in your local tree use
> (so the next version of these patches) use:
>
> git format-patch -v2 --cover-letter HEAD~3
> $editor v2-0000-cover-letter.patch
> <describe series contents + what was changed in the cover-letter>
> git send-email v2-00*.patch
>
> Regards,
>
> Hans
>
Sure, I will split this patch and resend all of them as a single patch
series including my previous patch.
>
>>
>> - if (psta) {
>> - psta->sta_xmitpriv.txseq_tid[pattrib->priority]++;
>> - psta->sta_xmitpriv.txseq_tid[pattrib->priority] &= 0xFFF;
>> - pattrib->seqnum = psta->sta_xmitpriv.txseq_tid[pattrib->priority];
>> + psta->sta_xmitpriv.txseq_tid[pattrib->priority]++;
>> + psta->sta_xmitpriv.txseq_tid[pattrib->priority] &= 0xFFF;
>> + pattrib->seqnum = psta->sta_xmitpriv.txseq_tid[pattrib->priority];
>>
>> - SetSeqNum(hdr, pattrib->seqnum);
>> + SetSeqNum(hdr, pattrib->seqnum);
>>
>> - /* check if enable ampdu */
>> - if (pattrib->ht_en && psta->htpriv.ampdu_enable)
>> - if (psta->htpriv.agg_enable_bitmap & BIT(pattrib->priority))
>> - pattrib->ampdu_en = true;
>> + /* check if enable ampdu */
>> + if (pattrib->ht_en && psta->htpriv.ampdu_enable)
>> + if (psta->htpriv.agg_enable_bitmap & BIT(pattrib->priority))
>> + pattrib->ampdu_en = true;
>>
>> - /* re-check if enable ampdu by BA_starting_seqctrl */
>> - if (pattrib->ampdu_en == true) {
>> - u16 tx_seq;
>> + /* re-check if enable ampdu by BA_starting_seqctrl */
>> + if (pattrib->ampdu_en == true) {
>> + u16 tx_seq;
>>
>> - tx_seq = psta->BA_starting_seqctrl[pattrib->priority & 0x0f];
>> + tx_seq = psta->BA_starting_seqctrl[pattrib->priority & 0x0f];
>>
>> - /* check BA_starting_seqctrl */
>> - if (SN_LESS(pattrib->seqnum, tx_seq)) {
>> - pattrib->ampdu_en = false;/* AGG BK */
>> - } else if (SN_EQUAL(pattrib->seqnum, tx_seq)) {
>> - psta->BA_starting_seqctrl[pattrib->priority & 0x0f] = (tx_seq+1)&0xfff;
>> + /* check BA_starting_seqctrl */
>> + if (SN_LESS(pattrib->seqnum, tx_seq)) {
>> + pattrib->ampdu_en = false;/* AGG BK */
>> + } else if (SN_EQUAL(pattrib->seqnum, tx_seq)) {
>> + psta->BA_starting_seqctrl[pattrib->priority & 0x0f] = (tx_seq+1)&0xfff;
>>
>> - pattrib->ampdu_en = true;/* AGG EN */
>> - } else {
>> - psta->BA_starting_seqctrl[pattrib->priority & 0x0f] = (pattrib->seqnum+1)&0xfff;
>> - pattrib->ampdu_en = true;/* AGG EN */
>> - }
>> - }
>> + pattrib->ampdu_en = true;/* AGG EN */
>> + } else {
>> + psta->BA_starting_seqctrl[pattrib->priority & 0x0f] = (pattrib->seqnum+1)&0xfff;
>> + pattrib->ampdu_en = true;/* AGG EN */
>> }
>> }
>> }
>> --
>> 2.32.0
>>
>
Thanks Hans for review.
Regards,
Saurav
Powered by blists - more mailing lists