linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: hal: remove if condition which is always false

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 10 Oct 2021 12:50:39 +0200
From:   Fabio Aiuto <fabioaiuto83@...il.com>
To:     Saurav Girepunje <saurav.girepunje@...il.com>
Cc:     gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, marcocesati@...il.com,
        dan.carpenter@...cle.com, lee.jones@...aro.org,
        linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        saurav.girepunje@...mail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: hal: remove if condition which is
 always false

Hello Surav,

thanks for your patch, see a comment below,

On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 01:02:56PM +0530, Saurav Girepunje wrote:
> Remove the if condition which is always false. The last update on
> variable max_rf_path is value 1. It's value is not changing after that.
> So if condition check for value 2 will be always false only.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Saurav Girepunje <saurav.girepunje@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/odm_NoiseMonitor.c | 10 ++++------
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/odm_NoiseMonitor.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/odm_NoiseMonitor.c
> index 392cc8a398f5..612575ba961a 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/odm_NoiseMonitor.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/odm_NoiseMonitor.c
> @@ -106,12 +106,10 @@ static s16 odm_InbandNoise_Monitor_NSeries(
>  	pDM_Odm->noise_level.noise[RF_PATH_A] = -110 + reg_c50 + noise_data.sum[RF_PATH_A];
>  	pDM_Odm->noise_level.noise_all += pDM_Odm->noise_level.noise[RF_PATH_A];
> 
> -	if (max_rf_path == 2) {
> -		reg_c58 = (s32)PHY_QueryBBReg(pDM_Odm->Adapter, rOFDM0_XBAGCCore1, bMaskByte0);
> -		reg_c58 &= ~BIT7;
> -		pDM_Odm->noise_level.noise[RF_PATH_B] = -110 + reg_c58 + noise_data.sum[RF_PATH_B];
> -		pDM_Odm->noise_level.noise_all += pDM_Odm->noise_level.noise[RF_PATH_B];
> -	}
> +	reg_c58 = (s32)PHY_QueryBBReg(pDM_Odm->Adapter, rOFDM0_XBAGCCore1, bMaskByte0);
> +	reg_c58 &= ~BIT7;
> +	pDM_Odm->noise_level.noise[RF_PATH_B] = -110 + reg_c58 + noise_data.sum[RF_PATH_B];
> +	pDM_Odm->noise_level.noise_all += pDM_Odm->noise_level.noise[RF_PATH_B];
>  	pDM_Odm->noise_level.noise_all /= max_rf_path;

If the condition is always false the whole block can be wiped out,
why did you keep it? Did you change the logic here?

> 
>  	/*  */
> --
> 2.32.0
> 

thank you,

fabio