linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] hwmon: (nct7802) Make temperature/voltage sensors configurable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <22086eb0-a25a-09c9-0f10-0702e412a6fc@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Mon, 11 Oct 2021 07:03:35 -0700
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Oskar Senft <osk@...gle.com>
Cc:     Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] hwmon: (nct7802) Make temperature/voltage sensors
 configurable

On 10/11/21 5:57 AM, Oskar Senft wrote:
> Hi Guenter
> 
> I appreciate your help with this!
> 
>> First, please don't top-post.
> Argh, I'm sorry - old habits! The Gmail web UI makes it too easy to do that :-/
> 
>> Second, no, submitting both patches was the right thing to do, but
>> you should not drop a Reviewed-by: tag if there was no change to
>> the patch.
> Got it, makes sense. How do I untangle this mess? Resubmit a v8, this
> time with the "Reviewed-by:" added back in? Or are you ok tagging the
> v7 again. I'm sorry!
> 

I'll tag again. No worries, just keep it in mind for next time.

Thanks,
Guenter