linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] hwmon: (nct7802) Make temperature/voltage sensors configurable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CABoTLcQtfoXCy+j9W6-NxAtWN13yTs322BFtCebbMCZr-cWzaA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 11 Oct 2021 08:57:49 -0400
From:   Oskar Senft <osk@...gle.com>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:     Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] hwmon: (nct7802) Make temperature/voltage sensors configurable

Hi Guenter

I appreciate your help with this!

> First, please don't top-post.
Argh, I'm sorry - old habits! The Gmail web UI makes it too easy to do that :-/

> Second, no, submitting both patches was the right thing to do, but
> you should not drop a Reviewed-by: tag if there was no change to
> the patch.
Got it, makes sense. How do I untangle this mess? Resubmit a v8, this
time with the "Reviewed-by:" added back in? Or are you ok tagging the
v7 again. I'm sorry!

Thanks
Oskar.