linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 01/12] LICENSES: Add the copyleft-next-0.3.1 license

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 11 Oct 2021 10:57:26 -0700
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:     Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Cc:     tj@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, minchan@...nel.org, jeyu@...nel.org,
        shuah@...nel.org, bvanassche@....org, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
        joe@...ches.com, tglx@...utronix.de, rostedt@...dmis.org,
        linux-spdx@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@...e.com>,
        Kuno Woudt <kuno@...b.nl>,
        Richard Fontana <fontana@...rpeleven.org>,
        copyleft-next@...ts.fedorahosted.org,
        Ciaran Farrell <Ciaran.Farrell@...e.com>,
        Christopher De Nicolo <Christopher.DeNicolo@...e.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@...mhuis.info>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 01/12] LICENSES: Add the copyleft-next-0.3.1 license

On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 10:37:42AM -0700, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 09:08:59AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 09:37:54AM -0700, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > I can confirm that LICENSES/dual/copyleft-next-0.3.1 matches
> > https://github.com/copyleft-next/copyleft-next/blob/master/Releases/copyleft-next-0.3.1
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> > 
> > > +   If the Derived Work includes material licensed under the GPL, You may
> > > +   instead license the Derived Work under the GPL.
> > > +   
> > 
> > nit: needless whitespace, though technically the original license
> > includes this too. :)
> 
> Indeed, I decided to leave the white space as the original had it too.
> Should I really get rid of the space or keep it?

Probably keep it for 0 diff with original. :)

-- 
Kees Cook