[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YWR7TuGNaMJLXdVr@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 19:58:38 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>
Cc: vkuznets <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
"longli@...uxonhyperv.com" <longli@...uxonhyperv.com>,
"linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>, Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
"Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@...il.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@...el.com>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
Andra Paraschiv <andraprs@...zon.com>,
Siddharth Gupta <sidgup@...eaurora.org>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [Patch v5 0/3] Introduce a driver to support host accelerated
access to Microsoft Azure Blob for Azure VM
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 05:46:48PM +0000, Long Li wrote:
> > Subject: Re: [Patch v5 0/3] Introduce a driver to support host accelerated access
> > to Microsoft Azure Blob for Azure VM
> >
> > Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> writes:
> >
> > ...
> > >
> > > Not to mention the whole crazy idea of "let's implement our REST api
> > > that used to go over a network connection over an ioctl instead!"
> > > That's the main problem that you need to push back on here.
> > >
> > > What is forcing you to put all of this into the kernel in the first
> > > place? What's wrong with the userspace network connection/protocol
> > > that you have today?
> > >
> > > Does this mean that we now have to implement all REST apis that people
> > > dream up as ioctl interfaces over a hyperv transport? That would be
> > > insane.
> >
> > As far as I understand, the purpose of the driver is to replace a "slow"
> > network connection to API endpoint with a "fast" transport over Vmbus. So
> > what if instead of implementing this new driver we just use Hyper-V Vsock and
> > move API endpoint to the host?
>
> Hi Vitaly,
>
> We looked at Hyper-V Vsock when designing this driver. The problem is that the Hyper-V device model of Vsock can't support the data throughput and scale needed for Blobs. Vsock is mostly used for management tasks.
>
> The usage of Blob in Azure justifies an dedicated VMBUS channel (and sub-channels) for a new VSP/VSC driver.
Why not just fix the vsock code to handle data better? That way all
users of it would benefit.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists